Inner Space :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on.
Open mind Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I suspect you see it as Tom Kuhn corrected and
> replaced Whig. But I'd suggest the best chance
> for progress is a healthy balance between the two,
> and the state of the peer review system today is a
> result of far too much emphasis on the Kuhn
> approach which, as a sole approach, is destined to
> fail as an overly linear approach to what today
> demands a multi disciplined lateral view for true
> comprehension.
>
> That's an opinion I formed from a 5 minute google
> search. Off the couch.
>
> Next
It shows.
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I suspect you see it as Tom Kuhn corrected and
> replaced Whig. But I'd suggest the best chance
> for progress is a healthy balance between the two,
> and the state of the peer review system today is a
> result of far too much emphasis on the Kuhn
> approach which, as a sole approach, is destined to
> fail as an overly linear approach to what today
> demands a multi disciplined lateral view for true
> comprehension.
>
> That's an opinion I formed from a 5 minute google
> search. Off the couch.
>
> Next
It shows.
M.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.