Inner Space :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on.
Open mind Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is of course so much evidence around us that
> points to the holes in the standard paradigm. Its
> a worthy discussion. But this little army of
> 'defenders of that paradigm' have riddled this
> post with digression and distraction so I doubt
> anyone interested in this discussion will labor
> through it to make a contribution. Its the fate
> of most posts of this kind here.
>
> If that was the intention then it was achieved.
> This idea has been successfully suppressed. High
> fives all around.
On the contrary, the digression and distraction have been Robert Jameson’s, from the moment his OP assertions were challenged.
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is of course so much evidence around us that
> points to the holes in the standard paradigm. Its
> a worthy discussion. But this little army of
> 'defenders of that paradigm' have riddled this
> post with digression and distraction so I doubt
> anyone interested in this discussion will labor
> through it to make a contribution. Its the fate
> of most posts of this kind here.
>
> If that was the intention then it was achieved.
> This idea has been successfully suppressed. High
> fives all around.
On the contrary, the digression and distraction have been Robert Jameson’s, from the moment his OP assertions were challenged.
M.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.