An eye consist of several components...even connected to the brain in a way we do not fully understand. BEFORE the eye became functional, it is impossible to conceive that these components were usable. But unusual components will, according to post-Darwinism, be removed during evolutionary process. IF evolution, as prescribed, all life forms would be teeming with alternative morfological traits. There is none. So of course, we would have found unlimited lots of intermediates. There is none. Ok. There is a couple, (like Archeopteryx?) that MIGHT be an intermediate, but more likely it is excamples of diversity.
Ps. Life has many "machines” that is faaaar more complicated than the eye. "Maschines”, These machines, like flagellum, are build systematically, protein on protein. It is actually not stupid, but more like ridiculous (dubble sorry) to believe in randomnes to build this. It contradict all we know about about thinking and making.
Says Guang Ming to Daily; "In the beginning, Darwinian evolution was a scientific theory. Actually the evolution theory changed to a religion. I agree.