And why you keep on talking about darwwin's original work, goodness knows, but it gives away your apparent wish to avoid all the studies and research that have gone on since then, extending and enriching the Theory.
Darwin's classical theory of evolution was based on field studies that rely on large populations, fragile ecological niches, and changing environmental conditions. When it morphed into it's more modern genetic form, one could preserve the model all the way down to single celled creatures-but not further.
The deal breaker these days is the virus--which doesn't seem to follow the same rules.
The real bugaboo to me is pathogeness--a proposal to explain the advancement of various species--it still doesn't work.
I think you're right that the pre-cellular "primordial soup" notion is fantasy, but that doesn't demand a creationist solution--even if some form of creationism may ultimately be required. One possibility is a self organizing system; another is seeding through meteors and comets.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 27-Aug-19 18:13 by Susan Doris.