Inner Space :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on.
After listening to the first six to eight lines, I copied and pasted below in the edit area straight away. As you know, Synthetic Dave reads everything in the same way, regardless of context, but already the arrogance is evident, i.e. in the choice of words. In my opinion anyway.
Susan
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 26-Aug-19 05:33 by Susan Doris.
What part of the definition of the word 'induce' is relevant here?Quote
Well, Ray, since you induce
Ray is one of the first to know that and in my opinion ray doesn't need reminding by you.Quote
the very same rigorous science clause, which is in it's adolescence stage, I will passover any more comments. Just remember THIS: science is NOT FINISHED YET!!!
I have never found that Ray does that, although he does evade the questions which would mean he has to look more closely at his faith belief.Quote
There are more things in the universe than what can be imagined in your limited philosophy. How can you call yourself a scientist when you close the door to any potential new research that may find you speechless.
It seems that you have failed to notice that neither Ray, nor any other scientist, has ever claimed to give an exact definition of reality.Quote
I always leave the door open for new discoveries, or have you FORGOTTEN that science has yet to define THE EXACT NATURE OF REALITY in as many words that can fill a paragraph!!
rubbish.Quote
I'm supposed, by your standard, to include ALL CURRENT science as COMPLETE?
'entities'? What 'entities'?Quote
I don't buy it!! There are so MANY UNDISCOVERED entities,
Susan
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 26-Aug-19 05:33 by Susan Doris.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.