IMO they prove each other. There's sufficient evidence that there was a civilization that was evolving and an advanced civilization that was here. Although, no one can explain it. We kind of dance around the notion. There's also evidence of a new civilization approximately 6000 years ago. There's biblical text that suggests all of this, not to mention other religious texts. But with conflicting opinions, instead of realising the obvious, everyone argues from on their own lines of thought. Instead of seeing the obvious, we all disagree because, if we do decide to agree on this, all sides are admitting that they are wrong about how they believe...