Thanks, Eddie. But I don't BELIEVE in telepathy in the same way as Susan has her materialistic beliefs. I damn well have it on papers from way back, experiments with friends, family and colleges. They did not believe it either, they lived it. Do you believe you just talked to someone on the phone? Does the other person believe it?
Well these days you can see each others' numbers after the fact, on your sets.
The best one of all my cases was when I sent several messages to a friend, from my head, my thoughts, and a few days later when we met she repeated it all to me, thinking she had dreamed it! Bingo! It was very detailed.
Actually, all the other cases are just as good, but this one was a hoot.


Eddie Larry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>

Quote
Susan said
> And that is why you can only say truly that you
> believe you know that telepathy works.
>

>
> Hi Susan Hi Gerda, I suggest a better way of
> saying Gerda’s point of view on telepathy, would
> be to say that Gerda has experienced messages from
> other people in her life and feels that these
> experiences are evidence of telepathy. Gerda’s
> statements (I.e., declarative sentences) are
> statements about those experiences, So those
> statement explain her beliefs.
>
> The notion that other people do or don’t
> experience telepathy (I don’t), or that
> Gerda’s experience is continuous or not are not
> really relevant. To prove or disprove Gerda’s
> experiences would take a tremendous scientific
> effort IMO which few scientists would really care
> to do. So Gerda’s beliefs remain just that,
> subjective belief . But her experiences of
> telepathy remain to her as real as looking at the
> maple tree in my back yard.
>
> This is how I see the logic behind a Gerda’s
> experience and her statements about that
> experience. If you think about it, it is similar
> to Susan’s experience and belief statements
> about her atheism. IMO, of course. Hope this
> helps.