Do you think I would cite his name, and provide links to his site, if I hadn't been there? In my opinion, he is a much better skeptic than any of the names I have mentioned. I have not read all of his works, however. I am yet to find any comments that aren't flagrantly stupid or dishonest.
But let's stay on point, however. Can you provide a commentary of his, that is on point to the OCT?