"It really is fascinating stuff."
Agreed! Thanks for sharing. As I believe I had told you prior to this, our most recent exchange, I am certainly not opposed to the idea of Jesus possibly being the latest Manifestation in an ongoing transcultural narrative.
To your subject line heading, if I understand you are saying invitro is not the same as 'divine' virgin birth, and I would agree. However, what "IVR" demonstrates, plainly, is the feasibility of 'virgin' births. As such, it no longer is reasonable to dismiss virgin birth as pure concoction. Such a position can only be sustained by considering our own evolution to the exclusion of the rest of the entire cosmos, a very pre-Copernican mindset, and one that simply doesn't hold up statistically. That was my main point in my previous email.
May I ask you this, Matt, how is your understanding of Western astrology? Do you have a basic understanding of how to read charts?