of the post because I have to find it to see what's missing.
And I will just point out that you have very repetitively not said what this 'real' atheism is you're always going on about.Quote
has it's foundation in your lack of any training in science, mathematics, and philosophy, Susan. It's so repetitive that I have long ago begun to refer to it as evangelistic atheism to distinguish it from real atheism.
Well, you're well and truly hoisted with your own petard here! Quote one post where I have ever done what you imply in these three sentences.Quote
To a Scientist, "objective" requires operational definitions; there really aren't any "scientific facts," and scientists never "prove" anything. If you had studied science, you'd know that.
Then, you wouldn't ever use "objective facts" as a test for the existence of God--or the reality of Spiritual experience.
And if you took the trouble to notice what I have been saying for years, along with other atheists , atheism doesn't need any studying, it is simply a LACK OF BELIEF in any god. I'll repeat that, atheism is a lack of belief in any god.Quote
If you studied up, you might be able to formulate a credible atheism that's interesting.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 26-Apr-19 17:52 by Susan Doris.