Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I listened to this post... ... I considered responding but nearly 600 words is too long, particularly as most of it is all about you and sounded like a blog. It sounded to me as if you have some sort of perception that this topic and, possibly, Inner Space, is now your domain and are awarding the topic metaphorical points according to your judgement of it. I hope I'm wrong, but simply shrug my shoulders and move on.

Susan


Itatw70s Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh my, oh my, oh my!!!
>
> Last but not least. What an enriching conversation
> throughout.
>
> EVERY PERSON IS A CORNUCOPIA OF KNOWLEDGE AND
> EXPERIENCE. Need any other explanation?
>
> No and Yes:
>
> I have been ostracized by some here, for the good
> and the better.
>
> My studies have enabled me to reach BEYOND the
> words of every man (billions of humans). I can
> only say that EVERY HUMAN IS A TREASURE TROVE OF
> KNOWLEDGE.
>
> Susan, since you have taken upon yourself to
> "educate" others of your convictions, I applaud
> you!!!
>
> My conviction is that every person (among the
> billions) has a valid claim of "knowhow".
>
> I address your deepest confirmation of NO IDIOTIC
> CLAIMS BEYOND THE SCIENCE OF THE PRESENT. Good for
> you!!!
>
> Just to remind you, I have declared a "no
> religion" stance of late. However, I also claim
> that other people are magnificent in their
> treatises of personal invocation and social
> inference, or, affiliation to an "accepted" form
> of lifestyle. This means that I take people by
> their words, of which, there are plenty here on
> this OP. Until that day, as I have declared in
> another OP, I have no religion. That took study,
> contemplation and conviction to accomplish that
> goal. I saw only what I learned, IN THE MEANTIME.
>
>
> Any subject is a good subject, with all of the
> "toppings", like ice cream on pie, are delicious
> thoughts and consummation of concepts. Yes, it is
> THRILLING to witness the BARE facts of Reality.
> But I will NEVER Argue with another for the favor
> of one minute of recognition or rejection. Albeit,
> that my course of action on this forum has been
> progressive and final in my choice, it had only a
> little to do with your contract of disagreement to
> anyone's contribution here on GHMB.
>
> There are no sad feelings concerning your
> contributions. They were all well and in order.
> However, a certain book, The Christ Conspiracy,
> which I read a decade ago has been a teacher to
> me. Myth, Magic, Mind Games and Mystery all have
> their place in this world of magnificent
> ideations. So it is.
>
> I allow and am informed by every concept that
> enters my mind; however, I choose what is probable
> and practical. It is choice, nothing more. I saw
> little to convince me of MAGNIFICENT ideations.
> Yet, I applaud those who persevere, just as I once
> did (for survival purposes).
>
> This DOES NOT MEAN THAT I HAVE CLOSED THE BOOKS OF
> MY STUDY. It surely means that I am convinced that
> myth cannot claim the same place as Reality. That
> is given.
>
> So, the Moon? According to an alternative history,
> the moon was caught by Earth when the planet that
> occupied the now asteriod belt gave up its matter
> to circumstance, eventually captured by Earth,
> gives reason to be considered objectively.
> Billions of years allows for ANYTHING to happen.
> The question I posit to you is: WHY IS THERE ONLY
> ONE ASTEROID BELT? It is OBVIOUS THAT SOME PLANET
> was destroyed there. What else could it be? Logic
> and insight are neccessary for logical deduction.
> Asteroids must have had a source!!! A planet
> destroyed must be the logical solution.
>
> Well, it's been nice talking to you.
>
>
> PS. Ray, I liked your S&G song. Quote: "And I only
> kiss your shadow, I cannot feel your hand, you're
> a stranger now unto me, lost in the dangling
> conversation".

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization 1215 Phanes 07-Apr-19 13:55
Mod Note > Topic Moved 187 Dr. Troglodyte 07-Apr-19 22:27
Re: The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization 209 Enigcom 09-Apr-19 21:09
Re: The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization 197 Phanes 13-Apr-19 06:13
Re: The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization 247 Susan Doris 10-Apr-19 05:10
Re: The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization 193 Enigcom 11-Apr-19 14:34
give James some credit 200 drrayeye 11-Apr-19 18:35
Sheldrake is mistaken, it seems ... 215 eyeofhorus33 11-Apr-19 21:05
Listen to his report (toward the end) 186 drrayeye 11-Apr-19 23:05
Re: give James some credit 173 Susan Doris 12-Apr-19 05:22
Re: give James some credit 175 Susan Doris 12-Apr-19 12:10
Re: give James some credit 176 PB Bytes 12-Apr-19 15:40
Re: give James some credit 171 Eddie Larry 12-Apr-19 17:00
Re: give James some credit 170 drrayeye 12-Apr-19 17:23
Re: give James some credit 187 Eddie Larry 12-Apr-19 18:48
Re: give James some credit 169 drrayeye 12-Apr-19 23:49
Re: give James some credit 176 Eddie Larry 13-Apr-19 01:21
Re: give James some credit 179 Susan Doris 13-Apr-19 05:36
A simpler response 189 eyeofhorus33 13-Apr-19 07:00
Too simple 176 drrayeye 13-Apr-19 13:06
Re: A simpler response 169 PB Bytes 13-Apr-19 16:39
Re: give James some credit 168 PB Bytes 13-Apr-19 14:39
Re: give James some credit 171 Susan Doris 13-Apr-19 14:54
Re: give James some credit 161 PB Bytes 13-Apr-19 15:01
Re: give James some credit 165 Susan Doris 13-Apr-19 17:03
Re: give James some credit 168 PB Bytes 13-Apr-19 17:09
Rupert 182 drrayeye 12-Apr-19 17:11
Re: Rupert 163 Susan Doris 13-Apr-19 14:46
Re: Rupert 171 drrayeye 13-Apr-19 17:12
Re: Rupert 159 Susan Doris 14-Apr-19 05:52
Re: Rupert 167 drrayeye 14-Apr-19 07:34
Re: Rupert 159 Susan Doris 14-Apr-19 09:35
Re: Rupert 159 Susan Doris 14-Apr-19 12:18
Re: Rupert 158 drrayeye 15-Apr-19 04:16
Re: Rupert 165 Eddie Larry 15-Apr-19 05:00
Re: Rupert 156 drrayeye 15-Apr-19 06:18
Re: Rupert 165 Eddie Larry 15-Apr-19 16:59
Entering 165 drrayeye 15-Apr-19 17:43
Re: Entering 159 Eddie Larry 15-Apr-19 18:14
Just a dangling conversation 163 drrayeye 15-Apr-19 18:45
Re: Just a dangling conversation 170 Eddie Larry 15-Apr-19 22:42
Re: Rupert 178 Susan Doris 16-Apr-19 04:57
Strong opinions 158 greengirl5 16-Apr-19 22:36
Re: Strong opinions 166 Eddie Larry 17-Apr-19 01:12
Re: give James some credit 182 Enigcom 12-Apr-19 23:37
Re: give James some credit 174 Susan Doris 13-Apr-19 13:15
Re: give James some credit 194 Naveen 13-Apr-19 20:52
Re: give James some credit 170 Susan Doris 14-Apr-19 05:56
Re: give James some credit 213 Naveen 14-Apr-19 11:02
Re: give James some credit 175 Enigcom 14-Apr-19 16:32
Re: give James some credit 188 Itatw70s 16-Apr-19 01:23
Re: give James some credit 173 Susan Doris 17-Apr-19 05:21
Re: give James some credit 174 Itatw70s 18-Apr-19 01:06
Re: give James some credit 157 Enigcom 20-Apr-19 12:57
Re: give James some credit 159 Susan Doris 20-Apr-19 13:46
Re: give James some credit 171 drrayeye 20-Apr-19 14:03
Re: give James some credit 159 Susan Doris 20-Apr-19 16:57
You can say 157 drrayeye 20-Apr-19 17:03
Re: give James some credit 150 drrayeye 20-Apr-19 13:48
Re: give James some credit 171 Susan Doris 20-Apr-19 17:02
It's not meaningless to me 158 drrayeye 20-Apr-19 17:09
The difference 165 greengirl5 20-Apr-19 22:16
Supernatural versus superstition 149 greengirl5 20-Apr-19 22:18
Re: Supernatural versus superstition 146 Susan Doris 21-Apr-19 07:36
Re: It's not meaningless to me 157 Susan Doris 21-Apr-19 07:27
This very issue 153 drrayeye 21-Apr-19 11:14
Re: This very issue 158 Susan Doris 21-Apr-19 12:57
Re: This very issue 260 greengirl5 21-Apr-19 22:27


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.