Inner Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Quote

Give James some credit
I did – I gave him credit for a vivid imagination. Also he has done a lot of reading. His results, however, are in my opinion more suitable for the paranormal board.
Quote

Susan
James deserves a more thoughtful response. The scientific anomolies described were factual and correct,
They were, however, combined with a great deal of wild speculation.
Quote

as were the references that documented a time before there was a moon.
Of course – I don’t think there are any astro-physicists who deny that.
Quote

The remembering of previous lives has been claimed by those carrying out psychoanalysis,
Totally absent is one single scrap of objective evidence.
Quote

so at least the concept has come up before.
As always, number of anecdotes does not equal evidence.
Quote

It's the association between a past life and claims about an artificial moon that sound to most of us like wild speculation.
And so they should – since this is exac tly what they are.
Quote

So, let's reject that part--at least for the time being. Is it scientifically implausable to assume that there was a pre-moon time? No. In fact, all scientific theories that explain the creation of the moon postulate a pre moon era. The capture of space debris by Earth's gravitational field is certainly possible. We've actually launched and placed some debris into rotaton around the earth ourselves.
No problem there.
Quote

Likewise, the recycling of life on this planet going back billions of years is not inconceivable.
If you mean any of ape mammal, then absolutely not. If you mean various basic, cellular or whatever life forms might have started and become extinct several times, then, yes, quite possible.
Quote

There is even evidence to support rebirth of life on a planet through pan spermia (seeding from a comet). The part hardest to swallow is that life fully advanced to at least the level of our planet today--and then died off: over and over.
Not only ‘hard to swallow’, it’s downright ridiculous.
Quote

James is just putting some of these ideas together in this brief writeup.
Is he hoping to have it published? Is he hoping to have scientific acceptance? I’m afraid I did not listen to every word further down the TLDR passage, since it is a muddle.
Quote

Justwriting these ideas off as rubbish in favor of a simplistic theory of evolution that has been discarded long ago
I do not know of a ‘simplistic’ TofE which has been ‘discarded long ago’ and which you think I believe, or follow, or something. Please provide a citation.
Quote

is a common tactic you employ: especially with new posters.
If people come to discussion forums expecting to have their posts accepted without challenge have obviously not read enough of said forum to find out first what happens.
Quote

I have become much more aware of where this atheistic religion of yours came from.
Oh dear! Firstly, the definition of a religion should include a god. Admittedly the word is now flung around so widely that it can mean anything, but atheism is a lack of belief in anything supernatural, especially gods!, and is not anything else, whatever attributes non-atheists like to give it.
Quote

It was only in the last few weeks that I came upon a talk by Rupert Sheldrake. Rupert described a much much stronger association between science and materialistic atheism than there has been in the United States--and his own "coming out." It's entirely audio:
I have seen and heard enough of Robert Sheldrake to take the stuff which goes right off the scientific method with a pinch of salt.
Quote

You might find it amusing. I think the main difference is that in Britain, it was supposed that a scientist--especially a biological scientist--was an atheist. Whereas here, in the USA, we just didn't talk about it. Sheldrake sees this recent atheistic era as a necessary cleansing process, and claims that you Brits are well on your way to a post atheistic revival of interest in spirituality and God.
I hope he’s wrong – if there is an interest in interpreting the word spirituality in a nono-woo way, that would be a good thing, but otherwise, I’ll avoid him!

Susan.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization 1217 Phanes 07-Apr-19 13:55
Mod Note > Topic Moved 188 Dr. Troglodyte 07-Apr-19 22:27
Re: The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization 210 Enigcom 09-Apr-19 21:09
Re: The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization 199 Phanes 13-Apr-19 06:13
Re: The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization 248 Susan Doris 10-Apr-19 05:10
Re: The Moon: Relic From An Advanced Prehistoric Civilization 194 Enigcom 11-Apr-19 14:34
give James some credit 201 drrayeye 11-Apr-19 18:35
Sheldrake is mistaken, it seems ... 216 eyeofhorus33 11-Apr-19 21:05
Listen to his report (toward the end) 186 drrayeye 11-Apr-19 23:05
Re: give James some credit 174 Susan Doris 12-Apr-19 05:22
Re: give James some credit 176 Susan Doris 12-Apr-19 12:10
Re: give James some credit 177 PB Bytes 12-Apr-19 15:40
Re: give James some credit 171 Eddie Larry 12-Apr-19 17:00
Re: give James some credit 171 drrayeye 12-Apr-19 17:23
Re: give James some credit 189 Eddie Larry 12-Apr-19 18:48
Re: give James some credit 170 drrayeye 12-Apr-19 23:49
Re: give James some credit 177 Eddie Larry 13-Apr-19 01:21
Re: give James some credit 180 Susan Doris 13-Apr-19 05:36
A simpler response 189 eyeofhorus33 13-Apr-19 07:00
Too simple 177 drrayeye 13-Apr-19 13:06
Re: A simpler response 170 PB Bytes 13-Apr-19 16:39
Re: give James some credit 169 PB Bytes 13-Apr-19 14:39
Re: give James some credit 174 Susan Doris 13-Apr-19 14:54
Re: give James some credit 162 PB Bytes 13-Apr-19 15:01
Re: give James some credit 166 Susan Doris 13-Apr-19 17:03
Re: give James some credit 170 PB Bytes 13-Apr-19 17:09
Rupert 184 drrayeye 12-Apr-19 17:11
Re: Rupert 164 Susan Doris 13-Apr-19 14:46
Re: Rupert 172 drrayeye 13-Apr-19 17:12
Re: Rupert 160 Susan Doris 14-Apr-19 05:52
Re: Rupert 168 drrayeye 14-Apr-19 07:34
Re: Rupert 160 Susan Doris 14-Apr-19 09:35
Re: Rupert 161 Susan Doris 14-Apr-19 12:18
Re: Rupert 159 drrayeye 15-Apr-19 04:16
Re: Rupert 166 Eddie Larry 15-Apr-19 05:00
Re: Rupert 157 drrayeye 15-Apr-19 06:18
Re: Rupert 166 Eddie Larry 15-Apr-19 16:59
Entering 165 drrayeye 15-Apr-19 17:43
Re: Entering 161 Eddie Larry 15-Apr-19 18:14
Just a dangling conversation 163 drrayeye 15-Apr-19 18:45
Re: Just a dangling conversation 173 Eddie Larry 15-Apr-19 22:42
Re: Rupert 181 Susan Doris 16-Apr-19 04:57
Strong opinions 160 greengirl5 16-Apr-19 22:36
Re: Strong opinions 166 Eddie Larry 17-Apr-19 01:12
Re: give James some credit 183 Enigcom 12-Apr-19 23:37
Re: give James some credit 174 Susan Doris 13-Apr-19 13:15
Re: give James some credit 195 Naveen 13-Apr-19 20:52
Re: give James some credit 171 Susan Doris 14-Apr-19 05:56
Re: give James some credit 213 Naveen 14-Apr-19 11:02
Re: give James some credit 175 Enigcom 14-Apr-19 16:32
Re: give James some credit 189 Itatw70s 16-Apr-19 01:23
Re: give James some credit 174 Susan Doris 17-Apr-19 05:21
Re: give James some credit 175 Itatw70s 18-Apr-19 01:06
Re: give James some credit 158 Enigcom 20-Apr-19 12:57
Re: give James some credit 161 Susan Doris 20-Apr-19 13:46
Re: give James some credit 173 drrayeye 20-Apr-19 14:03
Re: give James some credit 159 Susan Doris 20-Apr-19 16:57
You can say 158 drrayeye 20-Apr-19 17:03
Re: give James some credit 151 drrayeye 20-Apr-19 13:48
Re: give James some credit 172 Susan Doris 20-Apr-19 17:02
It's not meaningless to me 160 drrayeye 20-Apr-19 17:09
The difference 167 greengirl5 20-Apr-19 22:16
Supernatural versus superstition 150 greengirl5 20-Apr-19 22:18
Re: Supernatural versus superstition 147 Susan Doris 21-Apr-19 07:36
Re: It's not meaningless to me 158 Susan Doris 21-Apr-19 07:27
This very issue 154 drrayeye 21-Apr-19 11:14
Re: This very issue 160 Susan Doris 21-Apr-19 12:57
Re: This very issue 260 greengirl5 21-Apr-19 22:27


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.