Susan does not discuss, she preaches her private religion.
Susan Doris Wrote:
> By what authority do you decide to judge my postsQuote
Yes, Susan, your rebuttals are exhaustively
> redundant and I must allow others to also say
> their peace
> , let alone as
> *exhaustive* or *redundant*
> And why do you appear to think you can give
> yourself the same authority to *allow* posts or
> not? I remind you that we are all here on an equal
> basis, unless you can demonstrate that this is not
> the case.
> If you don't like my posts, don't read them. My
> name is always at the top so there's no excuse for
> saying you did not know I'd written it!
> All those flowery words – they probably haveQuote
concerning your constant ridicule of
> people's thoughts and experiences, that, I may
> remind you that you and everyone else are under
> the jurisdiction of Individual Sovereignty, that
> is to say, Personal concerns that are sacred to
> that individual's distinct EVOLUTION into
> knowledge and mastery over all of the conditions
> that confront an individual's LIFE COURSE.
> meaning to you, but they appear to me to be
> confused and a tad arrogant.
> So why bother writing that? It does notQuote
You are not someone's conscience. Your
> words are your own and that is recognized and
> acceptable to only you.
> contribute to discussion.
> Another meaningless paragraph. And I do notQuote
I've been here for two years and I see
> just about every post you proffer to this forum.
> Needless to say, I must be Myself, just as uncanny
> is the proposition that others here must be
> themselves as well.
> *proffer* posts, I post them.
> Is there a rule which says I must believeQuote
After all, you play the same song every
> something I do not? Is there a rule which says I
> must vacillate or change my views in order to
> conform to others’ opinions?
> As I point out to drayeye at times, I do not everQuote
Now, it your turn to speak.
> consider what your opinion is before I write. I
> respond to content of posts.