Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi Don,

I see you are trying to find the numbers by looking simply at the ratios of the angles. However, if we are talking about refraction of light (especially since the diagram looks like a typical ray diagram), then we need to be using refraction equations, namely using Snells law. What this law does is tell us is how much a ray of light will be refracted (or bent) when it passes from one medium to the other. Mathematically it is expressed as

n(1)sin Q(1) = n(2) sin Q(2), where n(1,2) is the refractive index of the first and second medium, and Q(1,2) are the angles of incidence and refraction (as measured from the normal of the interface).

So if we use your diagram, and have the interface as the horizontal line passing through G2 (and hence the normal is the vertical line), and if we assume that the ray of light is travelling from the direction of G1 towards G2, then we can use Snells law to calculate certain things.

This is where you will find things interesting. Lets assume that we are passing light from air into some unknown medium n(2), and use the angles to calculate the refractive index of the second medium. Typically we would use the refractive index of air as 1, but I know you like decimal places so we will use the value of air (at 0 Celsius and at 1 Atm) of n = 1.000293

So we have

n(1)sin Q(1) = n(2) sin Q(2)

1.000293 X sin(43.33) = n(2) X sin (31.95)

Thus rearranging we get

1.000293 X sin(43.33)/sin(31.95) = n(2)

hence the refractive index of the second medium is n(2) = 1.2971, Which is close to the value for ice, it is not exact. It is closer to the refractive index of ice at 0C measured at infra-red wavelengths (1250 nm) or at UV wavelengths (84.7, 135.5, and 138.7 nm). It even corresponds to some microwave wavelengths (calculated using here [www.wolframalpha.com])


Note using pure gases will not get you the desired angles as the refraction angles will be very small due to the small differences between refractive indices of each gas. You can use Snells law to verify this for yourself.

Jonny




This post was created using 100% recycled electrons

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Totally confused on The Periodic Table 1171 Ahatmose 05-Feb-12 03:39
Re: Totally confused on The Periodic Table 391 JonnyMcA 05-Feb-12 09:55
Re: Totally confused on The Periodic Table 277 Ahatmose 05-Feb-12 14:57
Re: Totally confused on The Periodic Table 364 JonnyMcA 05-Feb-12 15:52
Re: Totally confused on The Periodic Table 353 JonnyMcA 05-Feb-12 16:01
Re: Totally confused on The Periodic Table 315 Ahatmose 06-Feb-12 03:10
Re: Totally confused on The Periodic Table 317 JonnyMcA 06-Feb-12 18:26
Re: Totally confused on The Periodic Table 336 Spiros 05-Feb-12 22:00
Re: Totally confused on The Periodic Table 344 JonnyMcA 05-Feb-12 22:47
Re: Totally confused on The Periodic Table 335 Spiros 07-Feb-12 22:40
Re: Totally confused on The Periodic Table 337 Susan Doris 06-Feb-12 08:43
Re: Jonny/Ahatmose 368 Thunderbird 08-Feb-12 03:02
Index of Refraction 392 Ahatmose 09-Feb-12 03:08
Re: Index of Refraction 360 Ahatmose 09-Feb-12 03:25
Re: Index of Refraction 1346 JonnyMcA 09-Feb-12 08:34
Re: Index of Refraction 367 Ahatmose 09-Feb-12 16:10
Index of Refraction: The solution ? 412 Ahatmose 09-Feb-12 17:41
Re: Index of Refraction: The solution ? 368 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-12 09:03
Re: Index of Refraction 361 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-12 08:59
Re: Index of Refraction 349 Ahatmose 11-Feb-12 12:29
Re: Index of Refraction 405 JonnyMcA 11-Feb-12 14:12
Re: Index of Refraction 356 Ahatmose 12-Feb-12 13:11
Addendum: Index of Refraction 341 Ahatmose 12-Feb-12 13:19
Second Addendum: Index of Refraction 293 Ahatmose 12-Feb-12 13:26
Third Addendum: Index of Refraction 323 Ahatmose 12-Feb-12 13:32
Re: Third Addendum: Index of Refraction 330 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-12 16:03
Re: Third Addendum: Index of Refraction 341 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-12 21:17
Re: Second Addendum: Index of Refraction 348 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-12 15:40
Re: Addendum: Index of Refraction 330 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-12 15:34
Re: Index of Refraction 393 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-12 13:30
Re: Index of Refraction 328 Ahatmose 12-Feb-12 13:48
Re: Index of Refraction 339 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-12 15:32
Re: Index of Refraction 346 Ahatmose 13-Feb-12 01:23
Re: Index of Refraction 392 JonnyMcA 13-Feb-12 08:23
Re: Index of Refraction 373 Ahatmose 13-Feb-12 16:01
Re: Index of Refraction 369 JonnyMcA 13-Feb-12 19:01
Re: Index of Refraction 345 Ahatmose 13-Feb-12 16:47
Re: Index of Refraction 330 JonnyMcA 13-Feb-12 19:07
Re: Index of Refraction 339 Ahatmose 13-Feb-12 17:37
Re: Index of Refraction 331 JonnyMcA 13-Feb-12 19:20
Re: Index of Refraction 468 Spiros 05-Apr-18 14:20
Talk about stretching credibility: Index of Refraction 355 Ahatmose 13-Feb-12 05:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.