Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
O. K., Dokey, I agree with you about having major doubts about the electric universe theory as presented currently. However, I may be able to contribute toward an answer for some of your questions.

How is there a difference of potential between two planets? Theoretically, it's not unreasonable, when one considers the environment of space. While it is currently agreed that space is a relative, as opposed to an absolute, vacuum, this means that there is some material/matter in the void between bodies; this makes sense, because there must be SOMETHING, of some kind, for radio waves to propagate..a propagation medium, or something for the waves charge/act upon. Depending on the density/composition of this matter/material, a body passing through it will pick up or lose a charge due to friction, as well as imparted from the ionization of the matter, and radiation in the area. Also, space is FULL of ELECTRO-MAGNETIC radiation (radio, microwave, xrays, etc), all of which are striking planets, asteroids, nebulae, etc. constantly.

Now, after the dryness of the above paragraph, have some examples; in the dry winter air, or fresh out of the dryer, clothes tend to build up a static charge, sometimes quite a high one. The static cling of you clothes is built up due to friction...same thing with aircraft...static build up due to the friction with the air, and even moreso when flying through highly charged storm areas; you've seen the lightning storms, with an electrical arc several thousand feet long, and all due to movement/friction of air, and airborne particles. Similarly, in space, there are ionized (charged) regions of space, and all that elecro-magnetic radiation with its ionizing effects, all acting on any planetary body present in that environment.

I think it probably depends on the planet's own magnetic field strength, and whether it is strong enough to protect the planet from being turned into a terminal for a discharge. Depending also on the planet's structure, it may be able to slowly release a static charge back into it's local environment, much like aircraft do...if you've noticed, on the trailing edge of an aircraft's wing and tail/rudder, you can see little 'whiskers' pointing backwards...these are static discharge wicks, to prevent the build-up of harmful potentials in the aircraft's skin/airframe.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
'Electric cosmos' theory 785 rainman 10-Jan-04 21:58
Re: text only... 268 rainman 10-Jan-04 22:00
Re: text only... 258 OakeyDokey 10-Jan-04 23:34
Re: text only... 271 cardinal guzman 11-Jan-04 00:33
Re: text only... 253 scimitar 11-Jan-04 19:20
Re: Gravametric distortions 272 Thunderbird 12-Jan-04 05:06
Re: Gravametric distortions 216 Jergat 15-Jan-04 20:58
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 269 coggas 11-Jan-04 02:49
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 285 ArmchairObserver 11-Jan-04 09:42
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 250 OakeyDokey 11-Jan-04 13:16
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 235 Diomede 11-Jan-04 13:24
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 243 rainman 11-Jan-04 15:00
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 245 Diomede 16-Jan-04 06:57
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 224 Anne-Marie 16-Jan-04 07:53
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 240 Diomede 16-Jan-04 08:26
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 250 Diomede 16-Jan-04 09:13
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 236 Anne-Marie 16-Jan-04 17:27
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 262 cardinal guzman 16-Jan-04 19:46
Re: PS 246 rainman 11-Jan-04 18:18
Re: PS 237 Diomede 12-Jan-04 12:41
Re: PS 240 rainman 12-Jan-04 16:36
Re: PS 246 SunSword 12-Jan-04 21:05
Re: PS 242 Diomede 13-Jan-04 19:14
Re: Electrical Machining 231 Thunderbird 12-Jan-04 03:35
Re: Electrical Machining 249 Diomede 12-Jan-04 10:36
Re: Uniformity...the B.S. Benchmark 243 Thunderbird 13-Jan-04 16:53
Re: Uniformity...the B.S. Benchmark 263 Anne-Marie 14-Jan-04 19:22
Re: Uniformity...the B.S. Benchmark 256 Diomede 15-Jan-04 07:37
Re: Uniformity...the B.S. Benchmark 261 scimitar 15-Jan-04 10:51
Re: Electrical Machining 227 Anne-Marie 12-Jan-04 18:44
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 243 Richard Essame 11-Jan-04 22:03
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 292 rainman 11-Jan-04 23:21
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 272 cardinal guzman 11-Jan-04 23:45
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 231 scimitar 12-Jan-04 09:57
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 236 Geoff 12-Jan-04 00:26
Digital elevation mode.. 199 Geoff 12-Jan-04 00:41
Perspective........ 238 Geoff 12-Jan-04 03:32
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 254 Richard Essame 12-Jan-04 01:22
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 263 Richard Essame 12-Jan-04 01:35
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 295 Geoff 12-Jan-04 02:03
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 266 OakeyDokey 16-Jan-04 19:06
Re: Entry and Exit wounds 253 Thunderbird 16-Jan-04 20:12
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 241 scimitar 16-Jan-04 21:13
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 271 cardinal guzman 17-Jan-04 01:23
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 244 Melusine 12-Jan-04 03:41
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 256 Richard Essame 12-Jan-04 05:05
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 253 wirelessguru1 14-Jan-04 05:01
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 252 Richard Essame 14-Jan-04 07:29
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 241 Diomede 15-Jan-04 12:34
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 227 OakeyDokey 16-Jan-04 19:33
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 219 scimitar 16-Jan-04 22:04
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 245 cardinal guzman 17-Jan-04 00:48
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 251 OakeyDokey 17-Jan-04 23:43
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 203 scimitar 18-Jan-04 14:10
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 245 Anne-Marie 17-Jan-04 07:02
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 252 Anne-Marie 17-Jan-04 18:37
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 271 OakeyDokey 17-Jan-04 23:45
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 238 cardinal guzman 18-Jan-04 01:08
P.S. 202 scimitar 16-Jan-04 22:12
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 300 wirelessguru1 16-Jan-04 23:38
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 213 scimitar 17-Jan-04 00:56
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 247 wirelessguru1 17-Jan-04 08:16
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 228 Diomede 17-Jan-04 20:29
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 226 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 00:08
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 200 scimitar 18-Jan-04 14:24
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 251 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 14:42
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 338 Diomede 18-Jan-04 15:25
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 265 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 17:49
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 256 wirelessguru1 18-Jan-04 20:20
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 262 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 21:44
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 266 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 03:59
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 256 OakeyDokey 19-Jan-04 17:38
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 308 wirelessguru1 19-Jan-04 22:36
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 238 OakeyDokey 20-Jan-04 00:04
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 243 wirelessguru1 20-Jan-04 03:46
Re: Phase variance,matter,Nanomagnetism.... Ping for Diomede 242 Thunderbird 20-Jan-04 04:27
Re: Phase variance,matter,Nanomagnetism... . Ping for Diomede 204 Diomede 21-Jan-04 14:19
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 247 Diomede 19-Jan-04 19:12
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 220 OakeyDokey 19-Jan-04 19:23
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 246 cardinal guzman 18-Jan-04 19:21
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 213 Diomede 19-Jan-04 19:28
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 240 OakeyDokey 19-Jan-04 19:35
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 218 Diomede 20-Jan-04 16:49
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 232 OakeyDokey 20-Jan-04 17:12
Re: 'Electric cosmos' theory 250 OakeyDokey 18-Jan-04 18:01
grand canyon pic 244 cardinal guzman 05-Feb-04 02:08
Re: grand canyon pic 502 Thunderbird 05-Feb-04 05:45


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.