Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Susan Doris Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, I have managed to find out that this post is
> in response to mine immediately above it, but I
> really would appreciate your quoting me if you are
> responding to me otherwise it really is very
> difficult for me.
>
Quote

Can you not see the paradox of your own
> position? Pseudo-Skeptics claim, they support
> Science,
> Correction: sceptics usually do support science. I
> don't know what a pseudo-sceptic is - it seems to
> be a term used by those who wish to avoid a
> possibility that their faith beliefs are entirely
> subjective.
>
Quote

according to the methodology of Science
>
> Which methodology are you referring to here?
>
Quote

which is Science in it's purest form,
> Science says Psi effects are proven,
> Please cite the objective evidence for this.
>
Quote

so Skeptics turn on Science.
> Which ones? Where? How?
>
> Susan

Your first statement says that you do not associate a methodology to science. Science by definition is a method of enquiry with a series of protocols, and statistical analyses.

For over a century this methodology has been applied to claims or suspicion of conscious or unconscious knowledge which bypasses the recognised senses. An example of this is at the top of the initial post of the thread, and replicated here: [www.deanradin.com]

Dean Radin's Presentiment experiments and their Meta-analysis over thousands of examples of replicated experiment. The classic example is of course arch-skeptic Richard Wiseman oft-quoted as admitting that psi was proven by the normal standards of science. He didn't like the result so he then demands that Science change it's parameters and protocols until the results match his beliefs. The classic pseudo-Skeptic.


I have a good idea of your response to this, only reputable scientists can be accepted in their results and the definition of an accepted scientist is that he must not produce results supporting psi.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 1836 Me 24-Jun-19 20:39
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 231 Susan Doris 25-Jun-19 06:56
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 244 Me 25-Jun-19 11:51
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 211 D-Archer 25-Jun-19 12:47
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 215 Me 25-Jun-19 18:52
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 219 Susan Doris 26-Jun-19 07:20
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 194 cloister 26-Jun-19 08:24
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 199 D-Archer 26-Jun-19 09:50
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 193 cloister 26-Jun-19 14:31
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 205 D-Archer 27-Jun-19 10:20
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 213 ianw16 26-Jun-19 11:04
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 218 Me 26-Jun-19 12:14
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 220 cloister 26-Jun-19 14:00
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 209 Me 26-Jun-19 14:41
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 186 Susan Doris 27-Jun-19 11:12
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 230 Me 28-Jun-19 19:06
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 207 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 05:36
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 211 Me 29-Jun-19 16:30
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 186 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 17:28
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 198 Susan Doris 26-Jun-19 14:05
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 192 cloister 26-Jun-19 14:15
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 199 Me 26-Jun-19 12:08
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 192 Me 26-Jun-19 12:22
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 183 Susan Doris 26-Jun-19 14:22
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 204 Me 26-Jun-19 14:35
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 199 Susan Doris 27-Jun-19 11:15
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 192 drrayeye 29-Jun-19 12:44
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 209 Me 29-Jun-19 15:21
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 192 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 15:53
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 211 Me 29-Jun-19 16:45
General concerns 202 drrayeye 29-Jun-19 22:33
Re: General concerns 204 Me 01-Jul-19 00:39
Re: General concerns 227 paxton 02-Jul-19 15:19
Re: General concerns 187 drrayeye 02-Jul-19 22:35
Re: General concerns 347 Me 12-Jul-19 16:03
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 193 Susan Doris 29-Jun-19 15:45
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 204 D-Archer 26-Jun-19 09:46
Re: Very curious experiment in unconscious prediction 234 Me 26-Jun-19 12:02


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.