Thanks, I am afraid this discussion has not gone the way I had hoped. My main concern is with Tressoldi's suggestion that the future is unwritten or superpositioned to explain his last results. If that were the case he could not find the original correlation between unconscious prediction and outcome on the 50/50 odds. But that means he now has a correlation with no more than the internal computer function. Is that enough? Other Psi experiments show correlations with RNG systems and intent. Unless there is a flaw in the experiment, (which is a suspicion as he used a fixed number of image showings) this would mean the subjects have undergone Pavlovian conditioning in the prep part of the experiment to expect a nasty image when the computer RNG indicates one, all happening unconsciously. Hence I did wonder if anyone else could come up with a better explanation.