Hmmm. I am, unsurprisingly, still keeping my sceptical antennae on the alert.

Susan

Me Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I have read up on skeptics criticisms of Radin and
> others, they have helped endorse a lot of his
> work. Essentially the argument runs
> "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary
> Evidence." So in other words the standard model of
> scientific inquiry is bunkum, only claims which
> fit with the world view of the skeptic can be
> accepted, others require a different level of
> evidence. For example Richard Wiseman has
> repeatedly started to replicate scientist's
> research, only to invent brand new statistical
> systems in order to rescue the null hypothesis
> from the positive results of the investigation.