Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
laughin Wrote:

> In real science
> one does not keep "revisiting some assumptions"
> for each new discovery
> and then say "black holes do best fit the data"

Then it should be quite easy for you to find real published, peer-reviewed science that backs your statement. You're asking me to defend the science behind black holes, when you haven't even shown exactly where black hole theory (or whatever you want to call it) falls short. Further, I'm not responsible for that science, but unlike you, I give specialists the benefit of the doubt - in their specialty. I defer to them until I have reason not to.


laughin Wrote:

> of course they would
> when you modify your theory
> to fit every new thingy that comes along
>
> every one of the black hole theories
> from the beginning until now
> have been WRONG
> or else they wouldn't have needed to be modified

Can you explain every one of the black hole theories from the beginning until now? And can you explain how they have each been wrong? Specifically?


laughin Wrote:

> how many times can a theory be wrong
> before someone says "maybe we're going down the
> wrong road"
> and stops and asks for new directions?

Let's work our way through your claim above first, shall we? Because, as of right now, you haven't shown that only one of those "theories" is wrong.


laughin Wrote:

> theories are suppose to PREDICT discoveries
> and not constantly require modifications to the
> assumptions
> making changes to your theory AFTERWARD to make
> things fit
> means you don't know jack about what is really
> going on. PERIOD

Well, we'll see after you explain the specific shortcomings of all of the black hole theories.

Go on, we're waiting.

Brian

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
gravity waves "detected" 1593 laughin 11-Feb-16 16:34
Re: gravity waves "detected" 589 Susan Doris 11-Feb-16 17:44
Re: gravity waves "detected" 478 Sirius7237 11-Feb-16 18:30
Re: gravity waves "detected" 579 laughin 11-Feb-16 21:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 500 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:23
Re: gravity waves "detected" 536 laughin 12-Feb-16 15:51
Re: gravity waves "detected" 382 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 16:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 487 laughin 13-Feb-16 18:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 532 JonnyMcA 13-Feb-16 18:41
Re: gravity waves "detected" 605 Me 15-Feb-16 15:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 449 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 492 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 386 D-Archer 14-Feb-16 11:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 403 carolb 14-Feb-16 14:54
Re: gravity waves "detected" 400 Sirius7237 14-Feb-16 20:08
Re: gravity waves "detected" 501 carolb 14-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 518 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 437 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:59
Re: gravity waves "detected" 417 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 454 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:29
Re: gravity waves "detected" 368 laughin 14-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 311 skakos 15-Feb-16 14:07
Re: gravity waves "detected" 399 Pete Vanderzwet 11-Feb-16 21:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 520 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:38
Onto Dark Energy waves! 459 Eddie Larry 11-Feb-16 21:34
It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 314 David L 12-Feb-16 12:50
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 405 Spiros 12-Feb-16 17:09
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 467 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 12:47
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 480 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:15
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 430 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 18:53
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 451 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:39
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 389 Aine 16-Feb-16 01:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 514 dong 12-Feb-16 18:36
Re: gravity waves "detected" 510 laughin 13-Feb-16 03:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 435 dong 16-Feb-16 07:41
Liego 427 laughin 15-Feb-16 04:17
Gravity Waves of Propaganda the Sequel 421 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 509 skakos 15-Feb-16 12:58
Re: gravity waves "detected" 470 Aine 15-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 338 carolb 16-Feb-16 00:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 415 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 11:47
Re: gravity waves "detected" 557 carolb 16-Feb-16 12:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 369 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 14:13
Re: gravity waves "detected" 383 carolb 16-Feb-16 14:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 354 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 15:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 490 carolb 16-Feb-16 16:27
Re: gravity waves "detected" 500 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 14:08
Really? 387 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:11
Re: Really? 496 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:32
Re: Really? 484 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 15:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 485 carolb 17-Feb-16 18:05
mods! 438 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 11:13
Re: mods! 521 carolb 18-Feb-16 14:14
Re: mods! 522 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 16:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 603 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 01:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 420 Aine 17-Feb-16 14:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 466 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 350 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:39
Re: gravity waves "detected" 440 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 17:37
Re: gravity waves "detected" 518 Aine 17-Feb-16 18:49
Re: gravity waves "detected" 459 laughin 16-Feb-16 20:24
Re: gravity waves "detected" 306 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 16:23
Gravy Waves 625 D-Archer 20-Feb-16 11:39
Playing devil’s advocate on the discovery of gravitational waves 570 laughin 02-Mar-16 18:23
Scientists: we're 100% convinced 396 laughin 07-Mar-16 17:13
Black holes and big bangs can't co-exist 491 laughin 13-Mar-16 04:52
Re: gravity waves "detected" 431 brett z 20-Apr-16 23:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 437 laughin 21-Apr-16 14:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 355 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:45
Re: gravity waves "detected" 350 laughin 10-May-16 13:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 370 OCaptain 10-May-16 13:21
Re: gravity waves "detected" 421 laughin 10-May-16 19:25
Re: gravity waves "detected" 533 OCaptain 10-May-16 22:56
Re: gravity waves "detected" 435 laughin 11-May-16 15:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 539 JonnyMcA 11-May-16 16:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 534 laughin 12-May-16 16:26
pompousness "detected" 472 laughin 18-May-16 15:25
bump- 2 weeks 570 laughin 27-May-16 15:02
Re: bump- 3 weeks 512 laughin 02-Jun-16 23:20
Re: bump- 4 weeks and why isn't Carolb patrolling the threads 499 laughin 10-Jun-16 15:42
Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 477 laughin 04-May-16 13:15
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 489 D-Archer 09-May-16 19:05
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 312 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:46
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 520 laughin 10-May-16 13:27
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 360 OCaptain 10-May-16 16:39
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 417 laughin 10-May-16 19:10
how many times can you change the rules and still get a black hole 408 laughin 08-Jun-16 14:00
LIGO press conf, June 15 447 brett z 15-Jun-16 11:53
Re: LIGO press conf, June 15 433 D-Archer 15-Jun-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.