Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
laughin Wrote:

> In real science
> one does not keep "revisiting some assumptions"
> for each new discovery
> and then say "black holes do best fit the data"

Then it should be quite easy for you to find real published, peer-reviewed science that backs your statement. You're asking me to defend the science behind black holes, when you haven't even shown exactly where black hole theory (or whatever you want to call it) falls short. Further, I'm not responsible for that science, but unlike you, I give specialists the benefit of the doubt - in their specialty. I defer to them until I have reason not to.


laughin Wrote:

> of course they would
> when you modify your theory
> to fit every new thingy that comes along
>
> every one of the black hole theories
> from the beginning until now
> have been WRONG
> or else they wouldn't have needed to be modified

Can you explain every one of the black hole theories from the beginning until now? And can you explain how they have each been wrong? Specifically?


laughin Wrote:

> how many times can a theory be wrong
> before someone says "maybe we're going down the
> wrong road"
> and stops and asks for new directions?

Let's work our way through your claim above first, shall we? Because, as of right now, you haven't shown that only one of those "theories" is wrong.


laughin Wrote:

> theories are suppose to PREDICT discoveries
> and not constantly require modifications to the
> assumptions
> making changes to your theory AFTERWARD to make
> things fit
> means you don't know jack about what is really
> going on. PERIOD

Well, we'll see after you explain the specific shortcomings of all of the black hole theories.

Go on, we're waiting.

Brian

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
gravity waves "detected" 1562 laughin 11-Feb-16 16:34
Re: gravity waves "detected" 570 Susan Doris 11-Feb-16 17:44
Re: gravity waves "detected" 459 Sirius7237 11-Feb-16 18:30
Re: gravity waves "detected" 561 laughin 11-Feb-16 21:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 479 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:23
Re: gravity waves "detected" 519 laughin 12-Feb-16 15:51
Re: gravity waves "detected" 360 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 16:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 467 laughin 13-Feb-16 18:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 516 JonnyMcA 13-Feb-16 18:41
Re: gravity waves "detected" 582 Me 15-Feb-16 15:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 434 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 470 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 368 D-Archer 14-Feb-16 11:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 383 carolb 14-Feb-16 14:54
Re: gravity waves "detected" 381 Sirius7237 14-Feb-16 20:08
Re: gravity waves "detected" 482 carolb 14-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 495 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 419 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:59
Re: gravity waves "detected" 395 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 435 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:29
Re: gravity waves "detected" 347 laughin 14-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 288 skakos 15-Feb-16 14:07
Re: gravity waves "detected" 380 Pete Vanderzwet 11-Feb-16 21:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 503 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:38
Onto Dark Energy waves! 441 Eddie Larry 11-Feb-16 21:34
It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 296 David L 12-Feb-16 12:50
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 386 Spiros 12-Feb-16 17:09
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 450 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 12:47
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 461 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:15
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 412 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 18:53
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 433 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:39
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 371 Aine 16-Feb-16 01:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 499 dong 12-Feb-16 18:36
Re: gravity waves "detected" 493 laughin 13-Feb-16 03:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 414 dong 16-Feb-16 07:41
Liego 410 laughin 15-Feb-16 04:17
Gravity Waves of Propaganda the Sequel 403 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 486 skakos 15-Feb-16 12:58
Re: gravity waves "detected" 449 Aine 15-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 320 carolb 16-Feb-16 00:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 397 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 11:47
Re: gravity waves "detected" 536 carolb 16-Feb-16 12:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 352 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 14:13
Re: gravity waves "detected" 367 carolb 16-Feb-16 14:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 339 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 15:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 469 carolb 16-Feb-16 16:27
Re: gravity waves "detected" 479 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 14:08
Really? 367 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:11
Re: Really? 475 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:32
Re: Really? 465 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 15:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 466 carolb 17-Feb-16 18:05
mods! 420 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 11:13
Re: mods! 504 carolb 18-Feb-16 14:14
Re: mods! 500 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 16:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 582 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 01:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 401 Aine 17-Feb-16 14:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 444 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 333 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:39
Re: gravity waves "detected" 409 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 17:37
Re: gravity waves "detected" 496 Aine 17-Feb-16 18:49
Re: gravity waves "detected" 441 laughin 16-Feb-16 20:24
Re: gravity waves "detected" 290 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 16:23
Gravy Waves 606 D-Archer 20-Feb-16 11:39
Playing devil’s advocate on the discovery of gravitational waves 550 laughin 02-Mar-16 18:23
Scientists: we're 100% convinced 374 laughin 07-Mar-16 17:13
Black holes and big bangs can't co-exist 474 laughin 13-Mar-16 04:52
Re: gravity waves "detected" 412 brett z 20-Apr-16 23:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 419 laughin 21-Apr-16 14:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 337 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:45
Re: gravity waves "detected" 318 laughin 10-May-16 13:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 355 OCaptain 10-May-16 13:21
Re: gravity waves "detected" 401 laughin 10-May-16 19:25
Re: gravity waves "detected" 512 OCaptain 10-May-16 22:56
Re: gravity waves "detected" 412 laughin 11-May-16 15:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 512 JonnyMcA 11-May-16 16:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 514 laughin 12-May-16 16:26
pompousness "detected" 452 laughin 18-May-16 15:25
bump- 2 weeks 552 laughin 27-May-16 15:02
Re: bump- 3 weeks 493 laughin 02-Jun-16 23:20
Re: bump- 4 weeks and why isn't Carolb patrolling the threads 483 laughin 10-Jun-16 15:42
Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 465 laughin 04-May-16 13:15
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 474 D-Archer 09-May-16 19:05
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 290 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:46
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 503 laughin 10-May-16 13:27
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 342 OCaptain 10-May-16 16:39
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 397 laughin 10-May-16 19:10
how many times can you change the rules and still get a black hole 390 laughin 08-Jun-16 14:00
LIGO press conf, June 15 431 brett z 15-Jun-16 11:53
Re: LIGO press conf, June 15 415 D-Archer 15-Jun-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.