Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
laughin Wrote:

> In real science
> one does not keep "revisiting some assumptions"
> for each new discovery
> and then say "black holes do best fit the data"

Then it should be quite easy for you to find real published, peer-reviewed science that backs your statement. You're asking me to defend the science behind black holes, when you haven't even shown exactly where black hole theory (or whatever you want to call it) falls short. Further, I'm not responsible for that science, but unlike you, I give specialists the benefit of the doubt - in their specialty. I defer to them until I have reason not to.


laughin Wrote:

> of course they would
> when you modify your theory
> to fit every new thingy that comes along
>
> every one of the black hole theories
> from the beginning until now
> have been WRONG
> or else they wouldn't have needed to be modified

Can you explain every one of the black hole theories from the beginning until now? And can you explain how they have each been wrong? Specifically?


laughin Wrote:

> how many times can a theory be wrong
> before someone says "maybe we're going down the
> wrong road"
> and stops and asks for new directions?

Let's work our way through your claim above first, shall we? Because, as of right now, you haven't shown that only one of those "theories" is wrong.


laughin Wrote:

> theories are suppose to PREDICT discoveries
> and not constantly require modifications to the
> assumptions
> making changes to your theory AFTERWARD to make
> things fit
> means you don't know jack about what is really
> going on. PERIOD

Well, we'll see after you explain the specific shortcomings of all of the black hole theories.

Go on, we're waiting.

Brian

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
gravity waves "detected" 1637 laughin 11-Feb-16 16:34
Re: gravity waves "detected" 614 Susan Doris 11-Feb-16 17:44
Re: gravity waves "detected" 502 Sirius7237 11-Feb-16 18:30
Re: gravity waves "detected" 603 laughin 11-Feb-16 21:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 525 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:23
Re: gravity waves "detected" 560 laughin 12-Feb-16 15:51
Re: gravity waves "detected" 406 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 16:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 513 laughin 13-Feb-16 18:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 556 JonnyMcA 13-Feb-16 18:41
Re: gravity waves "detected" 638 Me 15-Feb-16 15:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 474 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 518 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 411 D-Archer 14-Feb-16 11:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 430 carolb 14-Feb-16 14:54
Re: gravity waves "detected" 421 Sirius7237 14-Feb-16 20:08
Re: gravity waves "detected" 523 carolb 14-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 543 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 462 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:59
Re: gravity waves "detected" 446 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 476 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:29
Re: gravity waves "detected" 392 laughin 14-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 337 skakos 15-Feb-16 14:07
Re: gravity waves "detected" 425 Pete Vanderzwet 11-Feb-16 21:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 546 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:38
Onto Dark Energy waves! 483 Eddie Larry 11-Feb-16 21:34
It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 336 David L 12-Feb-16 12:50
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 429 Spiros 12-Feb-16 17:09
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 491 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 12:47
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 502 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:15
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 454 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 18:53
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 475 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:39
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 411 Aine 16-Feb-16 01:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 537 dong 12-Feb-16 18:36
Re: gravity waves "detected" 534 laughin 13-Feb-16 03:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 459 dong 16-Feb-16 07:41
Liego 449 laughin 15-Feb-16 04:17
Gravity Waves of Propaganda the Sequel 444 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 536 skakos 15-Feb-16 12:58
Re: gravity waves "detected" 492 Aine 15-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 363 carolb 16-Feb-16 00:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 438 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 11:47
Re: gravity waves "detected" 583 carolb 16-Feb-16 12:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 393 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 14:13
Re: gravity waves "detected" 405 carolb 16-Feb-16 14:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 376 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 15:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 515 carolb 16-Feb-16 16:27
Re: gravity waves "detected" 521 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 14:08
Really? 410 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:11
Re: Really? 521 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:32
Re: Really? 512 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 15:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 508 carolb 17-Feb-16 18:05
mods! 461 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 11:13
Re: mods! 544 carolb 18-Feb-16 14:14
Re: mods! 550 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 16:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 628 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 01:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 442 Aine 17-Feb-16 14:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 494 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 374 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:39
Re: gravity waves "detected" 465 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 17:37
Re: gravity waves "detected" 540 Aine 17-Feb-16 18:49
Re: gravity waves "detected" 483 laughin 16-Feb-16 20:24
Re: gravity waves "detected" 330 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 16:23
Gravy Waves 651 D-Archer 20-Feb-16 11:39
Playing devil’s advocate on the discovery of gravitational waves 594 laughin 02-Mar-16 18:23
Scientists: we're 100% convinced 423 laughin 07-Mar-16 17:13
Black holes and big bangs can't co-exist 513 laughin 13-Mar-16 04:52
Re: gravity waves "detected" 456 Observer 20-Apr-16 23:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 461 laughin 21-Apr-16 14:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 378 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:45
Re: gravity waves "detected" 373 laughin 10-May-16 13:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 393 OCaptain 10-May-16 13:21
Re: gravity waves "detected" 445 laughin 10-May-16 19:25
Re: gravity waves "detected" 559 OCaptain 10-May-16 22:56
Re: gravity waves "detected" 463 laughin 11-May-16 15:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 574 JonnyMcA 11-May-16 16:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 556 laughin 12-May-16 16:26
pompousness "detected" 495 laughin 18-May-16 15:25
bump- 2 weeks 594 laughin 27-May-16 15:02
Re: bump- 3 weeks 537 laughin 02-Jun-16 23:20
Re: bump- 4 weeks and why isn't Carolb patrolling the threads 520 laughin 10-Jun-16 15:42
Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 497 laughin 04-May-16 13:15
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 511 D-Archer 09-May-16 19:05
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 341 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:46
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 543 laughin 10-May-16 13:27
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 385 OCaptain 10-May-16 16:39
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 441 laughin 10-May-16 19:10
how many times can you change the rules and still get a black hole 431 laughin 08-Jun-16 14:00
LIGO press conf, June 15 469 Observer 15-Jun-16 11:53
Re: LIGO press conf, June 15 453 D-Archer 15-Jun-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.