Science & Space :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
laughin Wrote:

> In real science
> one does not keep "revisiting some assumptions"
> for each new discovery
> and then say "black holes do best fit the data"

Then it should be quite easy for you to find real published, peer-reviewed science that backs your statement. You're asking me to defend the science behind black holes, when you haven't even shown exactly where black hole theory (or whatever you want to call it) falls short. Further, I'm not responsible for that science, but unlike you, I give specialists the benefit of the doubt - in their specialty. I defer to them until I have reason not to.


laughin Wrote:

> of course they would
> when you modify your theory
> to fit every new thingy that comes along
>
> every one of the black hole theories
> from the beginning until now
> have been WRONG
> or else they wouldn't have needed to be modified

Can you explain every one of the black hole theories from the beginning until now? And can you explain how they have each been wrong? Specifically?


laughin Wrote:

> how many times can a theory be wrong
> before someone says "maybe we're going down the
> wrong road"
> and stops and asks for new directions?

Let's work our way through your claim above first, shall we? Because, as of right now, you haven't shown that only one of those "theories" is wrong.


laughin Wrote:

> theories are suppose to PREDICT discoveries
> and not constantly require modifications to the
> assumptions
> making changes to your theory AFTERWARD to make
> things fit
> means you don't know jack about what is really
> going on. PERIOD

Well, we'll see after you explain the specific shortcomings of all of the black hole theories.

Go on, we're waiting.

Brian

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
gravity waves "detected" 1552 laughin 11-Feb-16 16:34
Re: gravity waves "detected" 562 Susan Doris 11-Feb-16 17:44
Re: gravity waves "detected" 452 Sirius7237 11-Feb-16 18:30
Re: gravity waves "detected" 554 laughin 11-Feb-16 21:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 471 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:23
Re: gravity waves "detected" 510 laughin 12-Feb-16 15:51
Re: gravity waves "detected" 355 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 16:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 459 laughin 13-Feb-16 18:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 508 JonnyMcA 13-Feb-16 18:41
Re: gravity waves "detected" 573 Me 15-Feb-16 15:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 424 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 462 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 360 D-Archer 14-Feb-16 11:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 376 carolb 14-Feb-16 14:54
Re: gravity waves "detected" 371 Sirius7237 14-Feb-16 20:08
Re: gravity waves "detected" 475 carolb 14-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 487 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:20
Re: gravity waves "detected" 411 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:59
Re: gravity waves "detected" 389 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 429 carolb 13-Feb-16 21:29
Re: gravity waves "detected" 340 laughin 14-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 282 skakos 15-Feb-16 14:07
Re: gravity waves "detected" 375 Pete Vanderzwet 11-Feb-16 21:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 494 JonnyMcA 12-Feb-16 14:38
Onto Dark Energy waves! 436 Eddie Larry 11-Feb-16 21:34
It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 290 David L 12-Feb-16 12:50
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 379 Spiros 12-Feb-16 17:09
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 443 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 12:47
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 453 Aine 15-Feb-16 16:15
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 404 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 18:53
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 425 laughin 15-Feb-16 20:39
Re: It took 100 years to discover what Einstein already knew 365 Aine 16-Feb-16 01:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 494 dong 12-Feb-16 18:36
Re: gravity waves "detected" 487 laughin 13-Feb-16 03:26
Re: gravity waves "detected" 408 dong 16-Feb-16 07:41
Liego 402 laughin 15-Feb-16 04:17
Gravity Waves of Propaganda the Sequel 394 D-Archer 15-Feb-16 09:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 476 skakos 15-Feb-16 12:58
Re: gravity waves "detected" 441 Aine 15-Feb-16 22:31
Re: gravity waves "detected" 313 carolb 16-Feb-16 00:57
Re: gravity waves "detected" 392 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 11:47
Re: gravity waves "detected" 529 carolb 16-Feb-16 12:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 345 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 14:13
Re: gravity waves "detected" 360 carolb 16-Feb-16 14:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 333 D-Archer 16-Feb-16 15:17
Re: gravity waves "detected" 462 carolb 16-Feb-16 16:27
Re: gravity waves "detected" 469 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 14:08
Really? 363 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:11
Re: Really? 468 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:32
Re: Really? 457 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 15:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 458 carolb 17-Feb-16 18:05
mods! 413 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 11:13
Re: mods! 495 carolb 18-Feb-16 14:14
Re: mods! 494 D-Archer 18-Feb-16 16:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 575 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 01:06
Re: gravity waves "detected" 392 Aine 17-Feb-16 14:48
Re: gravity waves "detected" 437 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 15:19
Re: gravity waves "detected" 325 Sirfiroth 17-Feb-16 15:39
Re: gravity waves "detected" 400 JonnyMcA 17-Feb-16 17:37
Re: gravity waves "detected" 488 Aine 17-Feb-16 18:49
Re: gravity waves "detected" 436 laughin 16-Feb-16 20:24
Re: gravity waves "detected" 282 D-Archer 17-Feb-16 16:23
Gravy Waves 599 D-Archer 20-Feb-16 11:39
Playing devil’s advocate on the discovery of gravitational waves 543 laughin 02-Mar-16 18:23
Scientists: we're 100% convinced 368 laughin 07-Mar-16 17:13
Black holes and big bangs can't co-exist 467 laughin 13-Mar-16 04:52
Re: gravity waves "detected" 405 brett z 20-Apr-16 23:42
Re: gravity waves "detected" 413 laughin 21-Apr-16 14:02
Re: gravity waves "detected" 330 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:45
Re: gravity waves "detected" 295 laughin 10-May-16 13:16
Re: gravity waves "detected" 349 OCaptain 10-May-16 13:21
Re: gravity waves "detected" 394 laughin 10-May-16 19:25
Re: gravity waves "detected" 507 OCaptain 10-May-16 22:56
Re: gravity waves "detected" 408 laughin 11-May-16 15:32
Re: gravity waves "detected" 506 JonnyMcA 11-May-16 16:53
Re: gravity waves "detected" 505 laughin 12-May-16 16:26
pompousness "detected" 444 laughin 18-May-16 15:25
bump- 2 weeks 546 laughin 27-May-16 15:02
Re: bump- 3 weeks 485 laughin 02-Jun-16 23:20
Re: bump- 4 weeks and why isn't Carolb patrolling the threads 475 laughin 10-Jun-16 15:42
Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 459 laughin 04-May-16 13:15
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 466 D-Archer 09-May-16 19:05
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 285 OCaptain 10-May-16 12:46
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 495 laughin 10-May-16 13:27
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 336 OCaptain 10-May-16 16:39
Re: Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Megamergers Are Weaker Than Predicted 390 laughin 10-May-16 19:10
how many times can you change the rules and still get a black hole 384 laughin 08-Jun-16 14:00
LIGO press conf, June 15 424 brett z 15-Jun-16 11:53
Re: LIGO press conf, June 15 410 D-Archer 15-Jun-16 14:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.