Science & Space :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board).
laughin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> hi bz,
>
> isn't it odd at the certainty "scientists" have
> with this event.
> both the "sound of two black holes colliding"
> originally detected
> and now this burst of gamma radiation, especially
> when "no radiation
> was expected" since nothing can escape a black
> hole.
>
> if it doesn't walk like a duck,
> or talk like a duck
> maybe it's not a duck
> so instead of modifying "how black holes work"
> to fit the new data
> admit something is amiss
>
> they found something, just not "two black holes
> colliding"
Like what? Using your duck theory, what best fits the data?
-------------------------------------------------------
> hi bz,
>
> isn't it odd at the certainty "scientists" have
> with this event.
> both the "sound of two black holes colliding"
> originally detected
> and now this burst of gamma radiation, especially
> when "no radiation
> was expected" since nothing can escape a black
> hole.
>
> if it doesn't walk like a duck,
> or talk like a duck
> maybe it's not a duck
> so instead of modifying "how black holes work"
> to fit the new data
> admit something is amiss
>
> they found something, just not "two black holes
> colliding"
Like what? Using your duck theory, what best fits the data?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.