Laird Scranton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> O Captain wrote:
>
> Whether it's one or a million, increasing
> quantities of mythological/poetical references do
> not make hard science as they accrue.
>
> You understand that, don't you?
>
> Newton was led to correct science by an apple
> falling, Einstein by thinking about what would
> happen if you were to toss a ball up on a moving
> train. Correct science doesn't depend on what your
> entry point may be.
>
> - Laird

Alright, but both the examples you gave eventually showed the math behind their observations. Where did Velikovsky show the math that explains his observations?