Laird Scranton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Aine wrote:
>
> I fail to see how any of this discredits the
> standard solar system formation model and
> validates Velikovsky.
>
> The oxygen suggests that comets may have formed
> later than is postulated by the standard model. It
> goes along with evidence from other comet studies
> that shows them to consist of a mix of materials
> that could only have formed under widely varying
> conditions, and so poses big difficulties for the
> standard view of comet formation.
>
> Velikovsky's view, which comes more and more into
> accord with what we know of planet formation in
> exo-solar systems, is that collisions with gas
> giants may be responsible for the formation of
> certain astronomic bodies. Gas giants like Jupiter
> are viewed as "pristine samples" of the original
> solar cloud, but their descending layers allow for
> the formation of materials under varying
> conditions. Given that the orbits of many
> short-term comets coincide with Jupiter, it seems
> only sensible to ask if they might have originated
> there.
>
> All of this is out of the ballpark of the standard
> model, and well in the ballpark of Velikovsky.
>
> - Laird

And it all only has its origins as Greek and Roman mythologies.

Not science.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 30-Oct-15 20:02 by OCaptain.