Science & Space :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
the current "comet models", i.e., fluffy snowball, dirty snowball, snowy dirtball, icy wanderer, etc,
were created to invalidate Velikovsky
while this doesn't "validate" Velikovsky,
it removes a lot of the "scientific" reasons
why he was deemed incorrect
For all that is Scientifically related to Cosmology and Space. (NB: Please take discussions about UFOs, possible Alien contact, Crop-Circles, Alien Abductions, Planet-X and Niburu to the ‘Paranormal and Supernatural’ Message Board).
Quote
OCaptain Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Starbinder Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > At some point maybe they'll start looking at
> alt
> > hypothesis in lieu of the never-ending
> surprises.
> > The standard Solar System formation models are
> > pretty well shot of late.
> >
> > “We weren’t really expecting to detect O2
> at
> > the comet – and in such high abundance –
> > because it is so chemically reactive, so it was
> > quite a surprise,” says Kathrin Altwegg of
> the
> > University of Bern, and principal investigator
> of
> > the Rosetta Orbiter Spectrometer for Ion and
> > Neutral Analysis instrument, ROSINA.
> >
> > “It’s also unanticipated because there
> > aren’t very many examples of the detection of
> > interstellar O2. And thus, even though it
> must
> > have been incorporated into the comet
> during
> > its formation, this is not so easily
> explained
> > by current Solar System formation
> models.”
>
>
> How does any of this validate Velikovsky?
the current "comet models", i.e., fluffy snowball, dirty snowball, snowy dirtball, icy wanderer, etc,
were created to invalidate Velikovsky
while this doesn't "validate" Velikovsky,
it removes a lot of the "scientific" reasons
why he was deemed incorrect
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.