Global Village :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For good-natured and mutually-respectful discussions of politics and current affairs. Soap-boxing and the promotion of extremist causes motivated by hate will not be tolerated by our moderators. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I don't have time to read it in detail right now, but one key point is that for some thing to be considered scientifically credible, the papers should be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals in such a way that any researcher (ie. preferrably not an internal 'researcher' with a specific aganda) could duplicate the experiments and see if the same results are produced. This does not appear to be the case.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
A Field Theory of Consciousness..#1 232 Astikapati 07-Jul-02 09:54
A Field Theory of Consciousness...#2..#1 198 Astikapati 07-Jul-02 10:00
Re: A Field Theory of Consciousness...#3(conclusion) 200 Astikapati 07-Jul-02 10:06
Exerpt from a book 97 Fuzzy 07-Jul-02 10:35
Fuzzy 96 Astikapati 07-Jul-02 13:02
This is not science 97 B L Zeebub 07-Jul-02 12:48
Zee, bub it looks like Science to me :)) 117 Astikapati 08-Jul-02 04:39
Scientific rigour 94 B L Zeebub 08-Jul-02 09:47
Re: Scientific rigour 87 Hoppy 08-Jul-02 11:47
Re: Scientific rigour 87 B L Zeebub 08-Jul-02 13:41
Re: Scientific rigour 90 mephisto 09-Jul-02 02:50
Re: Scientific rigour 112 B L Zeebub 13-Jul-02 12:25
Re: Scientific rigour 89 Hoppy 14-Jul-02 21:43
Re: Scientific rigour 73 B L Zeebub 14-Jul-02 22:30
Re: Scientific rigour 172 Astikapati 09-Jul-02 06:02


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.