> Dems ran the only person that could have lost to
> Now they're doing it again.
> The majority of Dems are too far left in
> fairy-tale land to nominate a normal person.
> Think of the country under someone intelligent
> like Yang. Limitless potential.
Did your college courses teach you to re-write history Pete? Seems to be your specialty.
You aggressively supported the man knowing he was dumb because you wanted to break the status quo by attacking those with experience governing and administrating.
That is what he has done since his election and you have defended him against all the concerns expressed that he could never handle an emergency.Quote
Yet for Trump and his allies, a war on elites has been central to the campaign which put him in the presidency and has maintained the loyalty of his core voters. Trump has taken particular aim at entities that could counter his power, which has helped stoke the ardor of his political backers.
Among his targets so far: the government’s intelligence agencies, the media, foreign allies, the Department of Justice, establishment politicians, scientists and the Congressional Budget Office. The last has played a large role in raising questions about Republican proposals to repeal and replace Obamacare, leading to a furious White House assault on its competence.
Saying Hillary couldn’t beat him defies the fact that the overwhelming majority of Americans voted for her. He snuck in through the electoral college and did so narrowly by inciting discontent toward government as a whole not just the opposing party. Hillary didn't lose on her issues, she lost because she couldn’t overcome years of a disinformation campaign leveled by the right, in addition to what Putin was doing as well as what was "literally" an attempt by the ruling party in the congress(Republicans) to use the powers of government to interfere in an election. By which of course I mean Benghazi-gate.
Typical anarchist, burn their shit down but leave mine alone.