Global Village :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For good-natured and mutually-respectful discussions of politics and current affairs. Soap-boxing and the promotion of extremist causes motivated by hate will not be tolerated by our moderators.
Race Jackson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>> Really, I tend to disbelieve most things presented
> in the media. Personal experience has shown most
> statements in the media are lies. When I have
> personally witnessed an event, and then read the
> media account, the media story diverges widely
> from what I have witnessed. And I have seen so
> many people contrive stories that are fiction. So
> I believe little. Which is fine.
OK, so you're saying you've personally witnessed a child being molested and the media reporting was inaccurate. Or just wtf are you saying?
I gather you don't believe all the men who have been interviewed ON TV telling their story of being molested by priests. Brilliant! Maybe if you read it in a cheesy no-name blog you would believe it.
> On the other hand, I have had people assert that I
> lied when I talked about an incident about my own
> family history that does not fit the conventional
> history books. And that is fine because - how can
> they tell? How can I tell? Can I interview those
> long dead ancestors? No.
>
> I have had female ancestors accused of being
> witches. Were they? Were they not? (They only
> suffered damage to their reputation, and having to
> move.)
What do your ancestors have to do with child molesters!?! Seriously dude, get a grip
> So I don't really care.
Oh, we all knew you didn't care about Epstein's victims.
How about them Jews, they're just popping up all over far-right blogs.
-------------------------------------------------------
>> Really, I tend to disbelieve most things presented
> in the media. Personal experience has shown most
> statements in the media are lies. When I have
> personally witnessed an event, and then read the
> media account, the media story diverges widely
> from what I have witnessed. And I have seen so
> many people contrive stories that are fiction. So
> I believe little. Which is fine.
OK, so you're saying you've personally witnessed a child being molested and the media reporting was inaccurate. Or just wtf are you saying?
I gather you don't believe all the men who have been interviewed ON TV telling their story of being molested by priests. Brilliant! Maybe if you read it in a cheesy no-name blog you would believe it.
> On the other hand, I have had people assert that I
> lied when I talked about an incident about my own
> family history that does not fit the conventional
> history books. And that is fine because - how can
> they tell? How can I tell? Can I interview those
> long dead ancestors? No.
>
> I have had female ancestors accused of being
> witches. Were they? Were they not? (They only
> suffered damage to their reputation, and having to
> move.)
What do your ancestors have to do with child molesters!?! Seriously dude, get a grip
> So I don't really care.
Oh, we all knew you didn't care about Epstein's victims.
How about them Jews, they're just popping up all over far-right blogs.
He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.