Buck 45 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Listen, Buck, you might be right, but you just
> haven't shown it with evidence."
>
> - Oh but I have. This ain't the first anti-2A
> rodeo we've had on this board and it isn't the
> first
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?2,11
> 40279,1140279#msg-1140279]Warwick lead
> adventure[/url] either. As Warwick's continued
> with his flawed premise, why would I waste my time
> reposting evidence that he and others have already
> dismissed? Therefor, I'll simply drop hints for
> those who have a curious mind and that hope does
> extend to Warwick.
>
> "And your appeal to "common knowledge " is just
> lazy."
>
> - Lazy? Nah. Optimistic? Probably.
>
> "works against you being understood by a broader
> audience than your more immediate peers."
>
> - If the audience is honest and curious, my hints
> are more than sufficient. If they're not honest
> or curious, then no amount of evidence is going to
> be enough.


Maybe you would have better luck if you thought more highly of your audience.