> Hi ES
> If,according to you, I can ask the mods for the
> report then you can also. After all its your
> report and you are the one using it to support
> your claim that in it you use the terms in
> question before Jonny. So why not ask for the
> report and present it?
It’s your allegation that I didn’t argue that the posting of the image was “gratuitous” independent of Jonny which you support with an incomplete timeline so it’s your obligation to prove my response was a lie (as you have repeatedly claimed). I already gave the Mods my permission and they didn’t respond so again I would suggest that you make your case to them about why you need the comments to close your investigation Chief Wiggum.
Why is this so difficult for you to understand or accomplish Dane. Obviously, you fear the content will demonstrate what a tool you are. Hope Pete appreciates the sacrifice you have made.
> Posting up the same BS doesn't make it true even
> when you put it larger type.
Advise you would do well to heed
> Speaking of truth. How about commenting on my
> question in my previous post concerning this post
> by Deep 1.
> I'll ask again.
> Are you the someone calling for the ban?
And I’m pretty sure everyone but you are aware of whom Deep was refering to.
Do I wonder why that is?
Have I repeatedly stated that it is not my interest to get Pete banned?
> "I'm not posting as a Mod but as a regular poster.
> The image is disturbing, no doubt, but Archaic has
> not violated any policies in posting it. Sometimes
> people need to see a picture that is worth a
> thousand words. The active Mods have done the
> right thing by providing a warning for graphic
> content instead of the picture being automatically
> However, calling for a ban on a poster for a pic
> that some people may be squeamish about is over
> the top. Chill."
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 23-Apr-17 14:28 by eli stills.