> Hi ES
> As I've continuously pointed out I don't need the
> report you made to the mods to support my claims.
> But you do. You are the one using the report to
> the mods to support that you used the terms in
> question prior to Jonny and that it was about the
> post and not the poster.
I disclosed that I reporting the post to adjust your timeline and provide reasonable doubt regarding your accusation but in your world you can promote whatever offensive allegation you choose without making the slightest effort to support your claim. Worse yet you contend that what you say must be true unless others prove thier innocents to you.
In this case you argue that you don’t need to request the report to support your claim that I “lied” about when I reported the post and what the content of my comment was in the report. How does a rational person possibly justify this contradiction?
Additionally you have continually charged that no one has provided a definition of the term “soap boxing” or if it can properly be applied to Pete’s behaviour and yet you were by me in a post that you continue to challenge for the legitimacy of its inclusion in the conversation. You claim that “others” have misapplied the term ‘soapboxing” regarding this incident but will not identify who or provide examples of such.
Apparently you hold yourself exempt from the demands of proof that you make of others.
Obviously you wish to distract form my criticism of Pete’s post but perhaps it’s time you provided your opinion of Pete’s use of a graphic image of the broken body of the latest victim of terrorist violence to garner attention. In his own explanation he provides that his intent was to manipulate members into responding to his latest Islamic terrorism and immigration OP.
Is this the sort of conduct you condone and wish to support? If so then anyone can easily provide the reasoning that they intuited people would not take their pet topic seriously without the inclusion of a graphic image of a violent act to startle others into reacting. Anyone could apply this logic to as many posts as they wish as often as they decide is necessary.
I reported THE POST because I don’t want it to happen again.
The announcement of the mods is that they don’t want it to happen again.
That is where this conversation would have ended were it not for your many attempts to challenge my intent and integrity with yet another wacky conspiracy theory being promoted as a distraction.