Yeah right your the victim here. Here are the facts ES. Below is your reply to Deep 1. But before we go there let's look again at LK74's definition of soap-boxing....."If you choose to make virtually every topic you post related to a particular subject, that is by definition, 'soap-boxing'."
What you'll notice is the usage of the word virtually which means nearly or mostly. It doesn't mean one or some it means nearly or mostly. If you notice in your reply to Deep 1 you state "This is yet again another topic" by Archaic and say its soap-boxing with a subject related to Islam.
As I've stated before this is your attempt to tie Archaic's post to the warning so action will be taken against him. Its very plainly presented. If not then why state this is "YET AGAIN ANOTHER TOPIC."
Its right there ES. As I stated before you can deny,spin,lie,dance around,play the victim and spew out crap. But your intent in this was for action to be taken against Archaic.
Here again is the post to Deep 1
"This is yet again another topic about a terrorist attack from a poster with a history of conflating and soapboxing on the issue of Radical Muslim terrorist attacks, immigration and the practice of Islam.
Author: Loki74 ()
Date: March 24, 2017 02:04PM
Slipping my mod hat on here.
There's a reason why you are given very little room to discuss issues related to Islam in these boards anymore, Pete.
Put simply, your POV creates a buttload of trouble and unrest, that quite frankly, we don't need.
As I have said repeatedly here over the past couple of weeks, the community comes first.
Your opinions are waaaaay down the list, I'm afraid.
Now - you are coming back onto the boards, after a fairly hefty suspension. Please be reasonable, and don't use tragedies as an opportunity to soapbox.
If you want to discuss your particular take on Islam, you have the whole wide internet to do it in.
But you won't be doing it here. End of discussion.
Do not reply to this message
If the poster felt the inclusion of the image was necessary one would think that he would have included it in the OP but instead added it in a later post to draw attention to his topic. That is gratuitous and sensationalizes the victim of a heinous crime for selfish personal reasons. Unlike images of sarin poisoning or napalm which demonstrate the cruelty of the weapon in this case we are all quite familiar with the damages done in a vehicular homicide. So yes we are adults and yes we know when someone is manipulating our emotions because they are desperate for attention and yes we have the right to object without being thought of as babies.
So given the history and the present conduct why the surprise that this is not the appropriate messenger for this topic.