So the reason why you provided the mod warning is because Deep 1 offended you with his dismissive and condescending attitude.
Ha Ha What a crock ES.
Again here is your quote to Deep 1 again.....
"This is yet again another topic about a terrorist attack from a poster with a history of conflating and soapboxing on the issue of Radical Muslim terrorist attacks, immigration and the practice of Islam."
This is after Deep 1 already states this...."This is ridiculous, a topic derailed. Archaic was trying to post about a truck bombing in Sweden. Instead, I see stuff about Islam, about outrage about the image (waah!) and connections to porn. Really??
What do you post to Deep 1? Well nothing about Deep's comments. Nothing about his comment being dismissive or a condescending attitude.
No you post this is another TOPIC on a terrorist attack by a poster with a history of conflating and soap boxing on Muslim attacks,etc. And then provide a mod with a copy of the warning. Yeah like any mod doesn't know about issued warnings.
Sorry ES you were trying to tie Archaic's thread topic to the warning so some action would be taken against him.
You even made this statement in the same post to Deep.
"If the poster felt the inclusion of the image was necessary one would think that he would have included it in the OP but instead added it in a later post to draw attention to his topic. That is gratuitous and sensationalizes the victim of a heinous crime for selfish personal reasons. Unlike images of sarin poisoning or napalm which demonstrate the cruelty of the weapon in this case we are all quite familiar with the damages done in a vehicular homicide. So yes we are adults and yes we know when someone is manipulating our emotions because they are desperate for attention and yes we have the right to object without being thought of as babies."
But this one appears to be for JonnyMca sake since he used the same word in a posting in this thread...... Here they are
"I think we could agree that this is not desirable and certainly not if people are gratuitously posting such images for the hell of it."
"We will take a dim view if people are being gratuitous about grim and grisly images."
"So no, gratuitous posting of ANY graphic images will not be deemed acceptible, and porn will most certainly not be next."
You make the point that Archaic's posting of the picture is gratuitous and only done for selfish personal reasons. This is exactly what JonnyMca presented as unacceptable.
You even close your post to Deep with this where you again mention Archaic's history and present conduct and that this isn't appropriate concerning this TOPIC.
Here it is.....
So given the history and the present conduct why the surprise that this is not the appropriate messenger for this topic."
Now again notice this entire posting is to present your claim that this post by Archaic is breaking the warning.
Again ES you can spin and spin and spin. But its all there in the thread and your post.
Your just pushing for action against Archaic.