Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
You wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to make an almost an immediate reply to the comments I aired below. It makes me wonder why you are so quick to refute any derisory comments on here considering the 'huge' amount of effort and work you are pursuing on 'Underworld'

Glad to be able to accommodate you.

I am enjoying this message board and have been willing to engage in debate despite the fact that I should be writing my book.

But let me get you right. What you seem to be saying is that if I take the trouble to engage in debate with you then you "wonder" whether I am really telling the truth when I say that I am putting a 'huge' amount of effort into the "Underworld" work.

Is that right? Is that your argument?

If so then you clearly feel that it would be good intellectual and scientific process if I didn't debate your comments with you.

If you prefer an open forum without rebuttals I shall be happy to give you that.

Believe me I'd much rather be lost in the mystery of "Underworld" and the magical places I have dived at than engage intellectually with somebody whose mind is as full of relf-righteous pomp, hostility, latent violence and knee-jerk cynicism as yours is.


You wrote
You are genuinely convinced by this 'rubbish' so you may well not fully realise the implication of miseducating millions of people in claims that you suggest to be 'scientifically proven'.

I am not miseducating anyone. I respect my readers and their ability to make up their own minds.I am offering my point of view -- my 'take' on things. You should give my readers credit enough to realise that. People are not fools you know.


You wrote:
Let me add that 1st year History undergraduates are taught how to distinguish genuine evidence from unsubtantiated claims. Its a valuable lesson that anybody conducting a scientific inquiry should be familiar with so I'm at a complete loss to explain why so many people have been taken in by your work.


Well, if you think my claims are unsubstantiated then you at least must be relieved that 1st year History undergraduates are safe from me -- having learned "to distinguish genuine evidence," etc, etc.

Presumably no 1st year undergraduates have made the mistake of buying my books. But really is it not a little presumptuous of you to assume that the rest of my readers (those who aren't/haven't studied history at University level) have been "taken in" by my work? I firmly believe that those people who broadly support my work, just like those who broadly oppose it, do so through a process of intelligent decision-making of their own (as, presumably, you have).

It is wrong of you to pour scorn on the intelligence of others in the way you do.

And yes, you're right, I shouldn't spent so much of my time dealing with your hate mail.

Perhaps I'll stop here...

All the best, Graham

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
EYESWIDESHUT? 842 Dr Winston O'Boogie 17-Nov-00 14:35
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 283 jameske 17-Nov-00 15:27
True enough, but he's right about the 'fruitcake' 336 Oddus Spuricus 17-Nov-00 15:37
RE: True enough, but he's right about the 'fruitca 266 jameske 17-Nov-00 15:52
Watch out they're watching you>>> 295 Scanda 17-Nov-00 16:20
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 437 Graham Hancock 17-Nov-00 15:43
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 289 peterk 17-Nov-00 15:55
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 298 Frank Leonard 17-Nov-00 16:38
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 251 Michael 17-Nov-00 16:59
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 301 Dr Winston O'Boogie 17-Nov-00 17:29
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 330 Graham Hancock 17-Nov-00 18:33
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 306 Clemencicus 17-Nov-00 15:48
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 307 Sky 17-Nov-00 15:56
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 316 Dr Winston O'Boogie 17-Nov-00 16:03
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 251 Michael 17-Nov-00 16:13
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 284 Christophe Leijnen 17-Nov-00 16:56
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 270 Julia 18-Nov-00 03:55
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 252 Julia 18-Nov-00 04:18
RE: EYESWIDESHUT? 462 Eyeswideshut 18-Nov-00 12:23

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.