What you suggest has been heard many times before i.e. Our real interest is in selling our books etc.. etc..
It is not only unfair to keep bringing this up against GH, but also downright offensive.
GH put much effort and time, and much personal risk in bringing this discovery to light. The NIO should have given credit where credit is due. They didn't do it, and that's insulting towards GH of the SES.
What possible justification can they have for not mentioning GH or the SES?You say there is much politics for them to consider vis a vis the scientific communities. That's pure baloney. Science isn't about politics. It's about facts. It is a fact that GH played the crucial role in this discovery. They should recognise this fact. Period.