Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
sometime i do not understand if you sarcastically mean anything. i am going to take this in its literal sense.

i am a scientist, a orthodox scientist in fact. i can strongly say, negative result is as good as a positive result and in no way it is inferior.

yes, i do agree that if we know that the result is going to be negative then, avoiding such attempt would be wise, but for someother reasons, those attempts are very much required, for example to prove that it is indeed a negative result.

but in this case, discovery of submerged mamllapuram may not be a positive result for "the flooded kingdoms of the ice-age" hypothesis, but this is a positive result for some other theories as they did discover a submerged temple. if there dive was entirely without any discovery, then probably one can say that it was not very usefull, but still, i would say without that you cannot completely rule out the story of sumberged mamallapuram!!

in my openion it was not at all a negative result, in the first place. secondly, it might not help to prove the ice-age civilisation, but......

i think i have said enough. repeatation is also not a good practice for a scientist unless it is critically required!!

thanks
prema

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 354 Graham Hancock 09-Apr-02 15:44
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 237 Dave R 09-Apr-02 16:03
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 184 KatDawg 09-Apr-02 16:08
Mahabalipuram dives 202 Rayw 09-Apr-02 16:17
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 175 ISHMAEL 09-Apr-02 16:28
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 204 subbul 09-Apr-02 16:33
apologies and i am ashamed 268 prema 09-Apr-02 16:49
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 191 IanScot 09-Apr-02 16:54
NIO's staffs previous statement about U shaped structure 179 prema 09-Apr-02 17:01
NIO's staffs previous statement about the U shaped structure at poompuhar 288 prema 09-Apr-02 17:02
Oh God, oops again. 287 prema 09-Apr-02 19:07
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 242 lobo-hotei 09-Apr-02 17:45
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 184 Daryl 09-Apr-02 18:39
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 175 lobo-hotei 09-Apr-02 18:58
Re: Well... 226 stickler 09-Apr-02 23:40
Re: Well... 226 stickler 10-Apr-02 00:16
Well... 189 Harry 09-Apr-02 20:18
Re: Well... 238 fisherman 09-Apr-02 23:20
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 147 MikeS 10-Apr-02 09:01
let us recap 225 prema 10-Apr-02 09:35
Re: let us recap 242 stickler 10-Apr-02 10:40
Re: let us recap 129 prema 10-Apr-02 10:42
Re: let us recap 195 MikeS 10-Apr-02 10:57
Re: let us recap 159 prema 10-Apr-02 11:34
Re: let us recap 222 MikeS 10-Apr-02 12:31
Re: let us recap 265 prema 10-Apr-02 13:01
Re: let us recap 226 MikeS 10-Apr-02 13:29
Re: let us recap 145 prema 10-Apr-02 13:37
Re: let us recap 226 stickler 10-Apr-02 12:05
Re: let us recap 206 MikeS 10-Apr-02 12:07
Re: let us recap 131 stickler 10-Apr-02 13:03
Re: let us recap 164 prema 10-Apr-02 13:09
Re: let us recap 158 Biruni 10-Apr-02 14:30
Re: let us recap 206 MikeS 10-Apr-02 14:48
Re: let us recap 247 Morph 10-Apr-02 15:28
result is a result not matter what it is 208 prema 10-Apr-02 15:40
Re: result is a result not matter what it is 232 Morph 10-Apr-02 16:01
my english is not good!!! 213 prema 10-Apr-02 16:52
my english is not good!!! 269 prema 10-Apr-02 16:52
Re: my english is not good!!! 244 Morph 11-Apr-02 11:24
Re: my english is not good!!! 226 prema 11-Apr-02 13:01
My Tamil is fantastic... 178 Morph 11-Apr-02 14:06
sorry 218 prema 11-Apr-02 14:12
Probably just me... 197 Morph 11-Apr-02 14:19
wow, i could understand this. 224 prema 11-Apr-02 14:33
Re: wow, i could understand this. 189 MikeS 11-Apr-02 15:07
Re: wow, i could understand this. 141 prema 11-Apr-02 15:16
Re: wow, i could understand this. 229 Morph 12-Apr-02 13:45
Re: wow, i could understand this. 354 prema 12-Apr-02 15:55
who said this? 237 prema 12-Apr-02 18:02
Re: Probably just me... 200 annika 12-Apr-02 19:55
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 270 Robert Bauval 10-Apr-02 17:59
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 266 fisherman 10-Apr-02 18:49
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 256 Robert Bauval 10-Apr-02 19:46
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 196 stickler 10-Apr-02 20:09
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 230 lobo-hotei 10-Apr-02 21:17
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 241 Daryl 10-Apr-02 21:32
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 237 lobo-hotei 11-Apr-02 07:47
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 238 stickler 10-Apr-02 21:58
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 210 Robert Bauval 11-Apr-02 07:07
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 187 stickler 11-Apr-02 11:58
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 222 Robert Bauval 11-Apr-02 15:40
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 231 Morph 11-Apr-02 11:27
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 256 lobo-hotei 11-Apr-02 05:29
Reread my earlier post as well 230 fisherman 11-Apr-02 17:07
Re: Reread my earlier post as well 178 Robert Bauval 11-Apr-02 21:34
Re: Reread my earlier post as well 177 fisherman 12-Apr-02 16:05
Re: Reread my earlier post as well 236 lulu 11-Apr-02 21:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.