Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
sometime i do not understand if you sarcastically mean anything. i am going to take this in its literal sense.

i am a scientist, a orthodox scientist in fact. i can strongly say, negative result is as good as a positive result and in no way it is inferior.

yes, i do agree that if we know that the result is going to be negative then, avoiding such attempt would be wise, but for someother reasons, those attempts are very much required, for example to prove that it is indeed a negative result.

but in this case, discovery of submerged mamllapuram may not be a positive result for "the flooded kingdoms of the ice-age" hypothesis, but this is a positive result for some other theories as they did discover a submerged temple. if there dive was entirely without any discovery, then probably one can say that it was not very usefull, but still, i would say without that you cannot completely rule out the story of sumberged mamallapuram!!

in my openion it was not at all a negative result, in the first place. secondly, it might not help to prove the ice-age civilisation, but......

i think i have said enough. repeatation is also not a good practice for a scientist unless it is critically required!!

thanks
prema

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 394 Graham Hancock 09-Apr-02 15:44
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 267 Dave R 09-Apr-02 16:03
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 216 KatDawg 09-Apr-02 16:08
Mahabalipuram dives 246 Rayw 09-Apr-02 16:17
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 205 ISHMAEL 09-Apr-02 16:28
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 294 subbul 09-Apr-02 16:33
apologies and i am ashamed 305 prema 09-Apr-02 16:49
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 221 IanScot 09-Apr-02 16:54
NIO's staffs previous statement about U shaped structure 213 prema 09-Apr-02 17:01
NIO's staffs previous statement about the U shaped structure at poompuhar 388 prema 09-Apr-02 17:02
Oh God, oops again. 320 prema 09-Apr-02 19:07
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 275 lobo-hotei 09-Apr-02 17:45
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 214 Daryl 09-Apr-02 18:39
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 207 lobo-hotei 09-Apr-02 18:58
Re: Well... 263 stickler 09-Apr-02 23:40
Re: Well... 257 stickler 10-Apr-02 00:16
Well... 220 Harry 09-Apr-02 20:18
Re: Well... 271 fisherman 09-Apr-02 23:20
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 179 MikeS 10-Apr-02 09:01
let us recap 255 prema 10-Apr-02 09:35
Re: let us recap 272 stickler 10-Apr-02 10:40
Re: let us recap 161 prema 10-Apr-02 10:42
Re: let us recap 224 MikeS 10-Apr-02 10:57
Re: let us recap 252 prema 10-Apr-02 11:34
Re: let us recap 254 MikeS 10-Apr-02 12:31
Re: let us recap 302 prema 10-Apr-02 13:01
Re: let us recap 259 MikeS 10-Apr-02 13:29
Re: let us recap 178 prema 10-Apr-02 13:37
Re: let us recap 257 stickler 10-Apr-02 12:05
Re: let us recap 237 MikeS 10-Apr-02 12:07
Re: let us recap 164 stickler 10-Apr-02 13:03
Re: let us recap 193 prema 10-Apr-02 13:09
Re: let us recap 189 Biruni 10-Apr-02 14:30
Re: let us recap 236 MikeS 10-Apr-02 14:48
Re: let us recap 283 Morph 10-Apr-02 15:28
result is a result not matter what it is 240 prema 10-Apr-02 15:40
Re: result is a result not matter what it is 262 Morph 10-Apr-02 16:01
my english is not good!!! 244 prema 10-Apr-02 16:52
my english is not good!!! 299 prema 10-Apr-02 16:52
Re: my english is not good!!! 277 Morph 11-Apr-02 11:24
Re: my english is not good!!! 257 prema 11-Apr-02 13:01
My Tamil is fantastic... 213 Morph 11-Apr-02 14:06
sorry 249 prema 11-Apr-02 14:12
Probably just me... 231 Morph 11-Apr-02 14:19
wow, i could understand this. 254 prema 11-Apr-02 14:33
Re: wow, i could understand this. 220 MikeS 11-Apr-02 15:07
Re: wow, i could understand this. 170 prema 11-Apr-02 15:16
Re: wow, i could understand this. 260 Morph 12-Apr-02 13:45
Re: wow, i could understand this. 388 prema 12-Apr-02 15:55
who said this? 274 prema 12-Apr-02 18:02
Re: Probably just me... 235 annika 12-Apr-02 19:55
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 300 Robert Bauval 10-Apr-02 17:59
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 299 fisherman 10-Apr-02 18:49
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 291 Robert Bauval 10-Apr-02 19:46
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 258 stickler 10-Apr-02 20:09
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 261 lobo-hotei 10-Apr-02 21:17
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 270 Daryl 10-Apr-02 21:32
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 270 lobo-hotei 11-Apr-02 07:47
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 268 stickler 10-Apr-02 21:58
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 247 Robert Bauval 11-Apr-02 07:07
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 217 stickler 11-Apr-02 11:58
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 254 Robert Bauval 11-Apr-02 15:40
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 260 Morph 11-Apr-02 11:27
Re: Mahabalipuram submerged ruins NIO Press Statement and GH comments 294 lobo-hotei 11-Apr-02 05:29
Reread my earlier post as well 348 fisherman 11-Apr-02 17:07
Re: Reread my earlier post as well 215 Robert Bauval 11-Apr-02 21:34
Re: Reread my earlier post as well 209 fisherman 12-Apr-02 16:05
Re: Reread my earlier post as well 273 lulu 11-Apr-02 21:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.