Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hello Loveritas,

loveritas Wrote:
> Hi T Bird,
> From your Vinca link :
> "Several eminent archaeologists of the time
> (such as Childe, Hood, Vlassa, Maccay), were
> convinced that the Vinca had somehow been
> influenced or 'cradled into being' by the mistaken
> belief at the time that the Sumerians were the
> 'Mother race'.
> However, much to everyone surprise, more recent
> discoveries of earlier Vinca settlements have
> shown quite clearly that events must have occurred
> the other way round as the Old European
> settlements, along with writing, pottery,
> metallurgy and 'Ubaid' style art, date to a
> thousand years before the first Sumerian
> fingerprint, suggesting remarkably that it was
> actually a Western European culture that
> influenced Sumerian development."

Nobody listens to Thanos. Sigh. It should be "(South) Eastern European culture".

> There may be some confusion as to just what
> constitutes the term Aryan.

This is why one would not want to quote Waddell as he was of the firm belief Aryans, or the "Nordic Race" as he also called them, originated from West Europe whom he considered to be the "oldest of all the civilized races" and "parent of all other civilizations". I believe the more apt term for those of Aryavarta are the "Aryas".

> The ancient name for
> India is Aryavarta, literally, "abode of the
> Aryans." The Sanskrit root of arya is "worthy,
> holy, noble." The later ethnological misuse of
> Aryan to signify not spiritual, but physical,
> characteristics, has lead down a racial path
> instead of one of enlightenment.

Of which Waddell is one of the most notable perpetrators of this misuse.
What does spiritual enlightenment have to do with the historicity of Aryavarta?

> The error hasn't
> been helped by Aryans being labelled
> Indo-Europeans, and/or, differentiated through
> language.

But it's an appropriate distinction to be made. The dating of Vedic literature beyond c 500BC is derived from one Max Muller in the 19th century based on his application of philology allowing for an arbitrary passing of 200yrs between the development of the classes of Vedic literature from when they were believed to have been first written down. Modern revision has refined this somewhat purporting they were compiled into oral tradition sometime between c. 1700-1100BC but not actually written down until c. 500BC. The problem I have with this as I have said before is this is all based on linguistic reduction and not actual archeological evidence which contradicts these beliefs. How could the Vedas be completed in oral tradition since 1700-1100BC yet it is only after they were written down in 500BC that there is an explosion of visible acknowledgement of these traditions whereas prior to this time there is virtually none? If true, it does not make much sense implying that the religious aspects of the Vedas were largely inventions of later culture much closer to when the Vedas actually began to be written c. 500BC.

Regardless, the point being missed here is that these Indo-Europeans are not one and the same as the Indus Valley civilization that preceded them by at least several hundred if not 1,000yrs or more yet the Vedas talk about history that goes back thousands of years even before their time. You have a completely unrelated people migrating to the region supposedly telling the history of another so the question is whose history is really whose? The Harappan/Indus Valley culture shows nothing relatable to the themes of the Vedic texts and are acknowledged as being clearly culturally different. Yet according to interpretations of the Vedas of such a long history they are one and the same claiming a history that goes back thousands of years earlier? There is no evidence the Harappans knew anything of any "Rama", "Vishnu", and the like nor held any of the same beliefs extolled in the Vedas. This is a serious problem which seems to be ignored.Vedic scholars want desperately for Vedic culture to be much older than it is but the fact seems to be that it is not and what is older is unrelated. Later revisionist tales imbued with unrelated religious beliefs imposed on unrelated peoples that came long before. Ring any bells?

Regardless, I have no doubt the Vedas contain valid historical accounts filtered and passed down through time and that the history of civilization in India is potentially much older than accepted; the writers were clearly privy to ancient knowledge and scientific/technological concepts they had no business having at this time. But the meme of spirituality and resulting religious historicity contained within them seems superimposed upon the unrelated peoples who preceded them by later revisionist writers well over 1,000yrs, in reality 2,000yrs, removed.

> This detour of major proportions was exacerbated
> by Hitler sending study groups to Tibet, Sikkim
> and many places worldwide in search of Aryans, as
> he believed that the Nordic race was Aryan and was
> ethnically superior to other races.

> Therefore, one can
> quite easily see how a balanced, unemotional
> viewpoint is difficult in a discussion of this
> nature.

Very true. In researching Petrie's Dynastic Race, a similar connotation, one comes across the same impasse of ignorance which is unfortunate as the archeology is still there regardless of political correctness.

> Hence, the bias by fellow academics
> against Waddell is understandable in this light.

Waddell wrote nearly all of his material well before the rise of the 3rd Reich and his works were clearly inspiration to some circles for racist/anti-Semtic thought including Natzism, though to be fair I do not think this was his intention by any means. The notion of "white superiority" was ubiquitous in Waddell's day and his work was largely dismissed by his peers regardless of it telling many people what they wanted to hear. The real backlash against his ideas from his fellow academics, other than his questionable interpretations and conclusions, was that his ideas were contradicting the prevailing Biblical view of a Semitic origin of civilization which rightly or wrongly is what he was largely roundly criticized for.

Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 26-Jul-15 15:46 by Thanos5150.

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 4739 Thanos5150 19-Jul-15 06:34
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 430 eyeofhorus33 19-Jul-15 15:43
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 794 Thanos5150 19-Jul-15 18:17
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 463 eyeofhorus33 20-Jul-15 07:24
Re: Serapeum 401 Thunderbird 19-Jul-15 16:21
Re: Serapeum 542 Thanos5150 19-Jul-15 18:28
Re: Pre Dyn Pharaohs/Sumer 432 Thunderbird 20-Jul-15 20:40
Re: Pre Dyn Pharaohs/Sumer 463 Thanos5150 21-Jul-15 05:31
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 390 Thanos5150 19-Jul-15 17:39
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 1362 Thanos5150 21-Jul-15 19:02
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 422 molder 20-Jul-15 12:05
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 403 Spiros 20-Jul-15 13:59
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 434 Spiros 23-Jul-15 02:27
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 532 DScribr 20-Jul-15 19:56
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 476 Thanos5150 21-Jul-15 02:28
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 321 Thunderbird 21-Jul-15 15:23
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 360 DScribr 21-Jul-15 19:48
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 470 eyeofhorus33 21-Jul-15 21:51
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 377 Jon Ellison 21-Jul-15 22:41
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 507 Thanos5150 22-Jul-15 05:16
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 364 Corpuscles 22-Jul-15 08:23
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 373 DScribr 23-Jul-15 18:28
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 402 Thanos5150 22-Jul-15 00:21
Ascension 409 loveritas 22-Jul-15 12:53
Re: Ascension 391 Thanos5150 23-Jul-15 05:17
Re: Ascension 395 Sirfiroth 23-Jul-15 09:49
Re: Ascension 377 Thanos5150 23-Jul-15 18:03
Re: Ascension 411 Thunderbird 23-Jul-15 14:53
The Aryans 543 loveritas 24-Jul-15 05:00
Re: The Aryans 636 Jon Ellison 24-Jul-15 09:49
Re: The Aryans 377 Thanos5150 25-Jul-15 04:11
Re: 2 Doors 374 DScribr 23-Jul-15 18:54
Re: 7 Gates - Book of the Dead 450 Thunderbird 24-Jul-15 19:39
Re: 7 Gates - Book of the Dead 492 loveritas 25-Jul-15 00:55
Re: 7 Gates - Book of the Dead 428 Thunderbird 25-Jul-15 15:59
Re: 7 Gates - Book of the Dead 576 Thanos5150 25-Jul-15 20:39
Re: Revisionists and the Theosophical community 447 Thunderbird 26-Jul-15 01:43
Re: Vinca/Indus/Mu - Lemuria 665 Thunderbird 26-Jul-15 02:38
Re: Revisionists and the Theosophical community 405 loveritas 26-Jul-15 03:05
Re: Revisionists and the Theosophical community 721 Thanos5150 26-Jul-15 06:11
Re: Revisionists and the Theosophical community 556 Thunderbird 26-Jul-15 15:59
Re: Sumer DNA Evidence 631 Thunderbird 26-Jul-15 15:30
Re: Sumer DNA Evidence 1106 Thanos5150 26-Jul-15 23:56
Re: Sumer DNA Evidence 388 Corpuscles 27-Jul-15 02:08
Re: Dating 406 Thanos5150 27-Jul-15 05:11
Re: Sumer DNA Evidence 454 Brian Patterson 27-Jul-15 15:34
Re: Out of Thessaly 432 Thunderbird 27-Jul-15 02:36
Re: Out of Thessaly 435 loveritas 27-Jul-15 03:44
Re: Out of Thessaly 424 Thunderbird 27-Jul-15 05:37
Re: Out of Thessaly 424 Origyptian 28-Jul-15 02:16
Re: Posnansky Tiawanaku 411 Thunderbird 28-Jul-15 02:47
Re: Sargon/Menes 424 Thunderbird 28-Jul-15 01:59
Re: Sargon/Menes 949 Thanos5150 28-Jul-15 06:30
Re: Sargons Empire 400 Thunderbird 28-Jul-15 14:51
Re: Sargons Empire 392 Thanos5150 28-Jul-15 17:54
Re: Sargons Empire 524 Origyptian 28-Jul-15 22:22
Re: Saron/Har Ka- Narmer/Naram Sin 445 Thunderbird 29-Jul-15 20:30
Re: Saron/Har Ka- Narmer/Naram Sin 429 loveritas 29-Jul-15 22:31
Re: Saron/Har Ka- Narmer/Naram Sin 601 Thunderbird 30-Jul-15 22:10
Now There's a Sarcophagus! 434 loveritas 27-Jul-15 00:08
Re:Be kind.....recycle : ) 457 Thunderbird 27-Jul-15 01:27
Re: Re:Be kind.....recycle : ) 377 Thanos5150 27-Jul-15 01:41
Re: Now There's a Sarcophagus! 427 Origyptian 27-Jul-15 02:17
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus, ETC. 374 DScribr 23-Jul-15 18:43
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 382 Corpuscles 21-Jul-15 07:19
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 378 Thanos5150 21-Jul-15 19:40
Re: I see Glass 409 molder 21-Jul-15 10:51
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 508 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jul-15 15:59
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 362 Thanos5150 21-Jul-15 18:31
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 399 Archae Solenhofen 21-Jul-15 20:14
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 459 Thanos5150 22-Jul-15 00:02
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 451 DUNE 21-Jul-15 20:18
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 415 Thanos5150 22-Jul-15 04:29
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 626 DUNE 22-Jul-15 09:02
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 395 Thanos5150 23-Jul-15 04:58
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 455 Corpuscles 23-Jul-15 11:06
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 504 Thanos5150 23-Jul-15 16:31
Re: Menkaure's Format 382 DScribr 23-Jul-15 19:10
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 621 Corpuscles 24-Jul-15 03:59
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 421 Thanos5150 25-Jul-15 02:33
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 495 Corpuscles 25-Jul-15 04:01
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 519 Thanos5150 25-Jul-15 04:56
Without inscriptions. 449 DScribr 23-Jul-15 21:13
Re: Menkaure's Sarcophagus Revisited 669 Thanos5150 24-Jul-15 03:08

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.