> DScribr wrote:
> > Your earlier comments ARE simply YOUR opinion, and in NO way
> > can YOUR opinions be considered valid physical evidence. Why
> > don't you apply YOUR standard of proof to YOUR
> > (YOU are seeing what YOU want to see IN PICS. You have NOT
> > there, the 3 HAVE been there.)
> Once again you are making zero sense.
> I only posted that because YOU claimed I never acknowledged
> that the "three expert Egyptologists" were even in those
> rafters. Clearly my post indicates I FULLY acknowledged that.
> I've never denied any such thing and my post proves that. And
> so once again, you were simply incorrect in accusing me of
> making a claim.
> Just as you are incorrect in insisting that I've claimed those
> blocks in the RCs "are NOT Tura". I've never said any such
> And OF COURSE my comments in that post are my opinion! They're
> based on my own observations of evidence I've seen
> (photographs, videos, etc.). And I'll use whatever standard I
> choose for "valid physical evidence". You may disagree with
> that standard early and often; it makes no difference to me
> whatsoever. I've never forced my opinion on anyone else. I've
> only taken issue with the evidence presented by others
> according to whether I consider it logical in its application
> to the point. For example, basing the claim that the Romans
> quarried the Trilithon simply on the fact that those megaliths
> form the foundation of the Temple of Jupiter is an illogical
> presumption. It's a mental leap in logic and not at all a clear
> logical progression.
> > No doubt Houdin knows ALOT more than you about Geology, ETC.
> > regardless of how unclear it is to YOU what he knows.
> I highly doubt that.
> > You ARE fixated with telling us that they are NOT Tura, and
> > your posts in 'Raising The Roof' are ample proof of this.
> And once again I ask you to please post any citation where I've
> ever specifically claimed they were NOT Tura, let alone being
> "fixated" on such a thing? The truth is, I have NEVER said that
> those blocks are NOT Tura limestone. I've only asked others why
> they believe they are since I've seen no definitive evidence
> that they are, other than "three expert Egyptologists" who have
> unknown background in geology, and I've also pointed to
> evidence that seems to contradict the Tura claim.
> For example, does this sound like I'm fixated on claiming "they
> are NOT Tura"?:
"Indeed, even if the gable slab is Tura,
> it's still darker than the coating, which is obvious at the
> margin of the coating which reveals the underlying darker color
> of that slab. So no matter what the slab is made of, there is a
> whiter coating laid on top of it, according to the best
> physical evidence available (ie, photographic)."
> point is that you are the one fixated on whether those blocks
> are Tura and yet there's been no proof to back up that claim.
> On the other hand, I see evidence that there is a white coating
> over part of several blocks up there. I'm not trying to force
> that on you, so why are you so fixated on forcing your opinion
> on me?
> > Bears repeating: Ori refuses to accept the truth, and is too
> wishy-washy to
> > claim ANYTHING definitively....BUT, this doesn't stop you
> > telling us repeatedly that they are not Tura.
> Unfortunately, you've been wrong about every single allegation
> you've made about me which is why you're obviously having great
> difficulty trying to substantiate any of those claims.
You still don't get it. Ori refuses to accept the truth, and is too wishy-washy to claim ANYTHING definitively.
Let me spell it out for you: you have NOT DEFINITIVELY or specifically claimed ANYTHING from day one, but your message IS clear.....you are simply playing word games because you are too WIMPY to claim anything definitively, and, in your mind, this little game absolves you from EVER having to provide valid evidence, e.g. 'it seems'....'evidence suggests'.
YOU were NOT there, YOU only have viewed pis. The 3 eye-witnesses have been there, examined the real thing with their own eyes, and, unlike you, these 3 KNOW what they are talking about. YOUR opinion is based solely on YOUR speculations of pics of YOUR choice. The 3 eye-witness accounts ARE THE EVIDENCE.
Why don't you apply YOUR standard of proof to YOUR 'non-claims'???
I've been correct about every single allegation I've made, but you will never admit to anything. The proof of this is here for ALL to see.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."