> Jon Ellison wrote:
> > I think they're getting slightly confused about the
> > between a question and a statement.
> > I seem to recall saying that the blocks may be brown
> > painted , and it would require testing to be 100% certain of
> > anything one way or the other.
> > My opinion is, that they could well be painted.???
> > That's "could" not "are"..
> > No facts.
> By the way, what is the basis for DScribr and Corpuscles
> implying that those roof blocks ARE Tura? I'm unaware of any
> physical evidence attesting to that.
That's because you refuse to accept the 3 well-documented eye-witness accounts, (made by well-respected Egyptolgists) that all state they ARE Tura...in fact, you now refuse to admit these accounts even exist.
Reality-what a concept.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."