Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Hi Jon,
Once again you have proven that when it comes to the truth, you just don't care, and are willing to say anything, no matter how dishonest.
You state :
"I have no idea what Describer is talking about because as far as I am aware Ori has not presented any "Facts". He's asking questions, not answering them."
This is not true.
Origyptian stated :
""Rather, the evidence is weighing in the direction that those objects at Mons C. were part of a self-consistent infrastructure at that site which had already been established before the Romans acquired it and repurposed the stonework that was already there."
Followed by :
"From all that I've seen from Mons Claudianus, there is compelling evidence that those granite artifacts were not quarried by the Romans but rather were originally part of the infrastructure of far older structures within those settlements..."
These are not questions.
These are counterclaims.
Unsupported counterclaims.
If he has "evidence," then this "evidence" must contain "facts."
Origyptian has no evidence to support his counterclaims, and, despite your attempt to convince the board that he was "only asking questions," it is obvious that you are being extremely untruthful in another vainglorious episode in saving face.
It is now quite apparent that the Romans, and the Romans only, were responsible for the quarrying at Mons Claudianus. To constantly challenge this fact is to insult those field workers who spent years in trying conditions to clarify this time in history for the benefit of others.
To disparage their contribution in the way in which you and Origyptian have done is the most shameful act that I have ever seen on this board.
You have now both embarrassed yourselves, possibly to the point of no recovery. Neither of you has any credibility, but then, Origyptian never did. As a "newbie", you were given some leeway in your first forays on the board as to incorrect assumptions. That period of grace is long gone.
How you and Origyptian can continue to post here after this latest debacle shows exactly your complete disrespect for the board and other posters.
You both should be extremely ashamed and apologize for your dishonesty.
lover
Post Edited (24-Jun-15 22:17)
Once again you have proven that when it comes to the truth, you just don't care, and are willing to say anything, no matter how dishonest.
You state :
"I have no idea what Describer is talking about because as far as I am aware Ori has not presented any "Facts". He's asking questions, not answering them."
This is not true.
Origyptian stated :
""Rather, the evidence is weighing in the direction that those objects at Mons C. were part of a self-consistent infrastructure at that site which had already been established before the Romans acquired it and repurposed the stonework that was already there."
Followed by :
"From all that I've seen from Mons Claudianus, there is compelling evidence that those granite artifacts were not quarried by the Romans but rather were originally part of the infrastructure of far older structures within those settlements..."
These are not questions.
These are counterclaims.
Unsupported counterclaims.
If he has "evidence," then this "evidence" must contain "facts."
Origyptian has no evidence to support his counterclaims, and, despite your attempt to convince the board that he was "only asking questions," it is obvious that you are being extremely untruthful in another vainglorious episode in saving face.
It is now quite apparent that the Romans, and the Romans only, were responsible for the quarrying at Mons Claudianus. To constantly challenge this fact is to insult those field workers who spent years in trying conditions to clarify this time in history for the benefit of others.
To disparage their contribution in the way in which you and Origyptian have done is the most shameful act that I have ever seen on this board.
You have now both embarrassed yourselves, possibly to the point of no recovery. Neither of you has any credibility, but then, Origyptian never did. As a "newbie", you were given some leeway in your first forays on the board as to incorrect assumptions. That period of grace is long gone.
How you and Origyptian can continue to post here after this latest debacle shows exactly your complete disrespect for the board and other posters.
You both should be extremely ashamed and apologize for your dishonesty.
lover
Post Edited (24-Jun-15 22:17)
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.