Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
cladking wrote:
> They continued cladding this way doing the upper steps first
> all the way to the bottom. The last stone on the pyramid was
> likely a cladding stone at 79' in the center of the north side.
Now I finally understand what you've said before about them being step pyramids. Thanks for the explanation
How do you figure pillagers got the casing down from the higher courses? Don't you see that as a major problem considering the weight?
And why take stones from the top, why not from the bottom and whittle the pyramid into an obelisk.
> They continued cladding this way doing the upper steps first
> all the way to the bottom. The last stone on the pyramid was
> likely a cladding stone at 79' in the center of the north side.
Now I finally understand what you've said before about them being step pyramids. Thanks for the explanation
How do you figure pillagers got the casing down from the higher courses? Don't you see that as a major problem considering the weight?
And why take stones from the top, why not from the bottom and whittle the pyramid into an obelisk.
He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.