Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
loveritas wrote:
> Hi Origyptian,
>
> You stated :
>
> "From all that I've seen from Mons Claudianus, there is
> compelling evidence that those granite artifacts were not
> quarried by the Romans but rather were originally part of the
> infrastructure of far older structures within those
> settlements..."
>
> There is no compelling evidence.
>
> Actually, there is not a shred of evidence to support such a
> stupid, nonsensical statement. Do you really think that any
> rational person would believe that the Mons Claudianus was the
> site of an unknown culture who just happened to have built a
> version of the Pantheon there (even if it was just the
> columns), and it fell down, was discovered by the Romans and
> transported back to Rome?
>
> How could any sane person possibly come up with such claptrap?
> Again, you just make things up in your own mind, somehow
> convince yourself of their veracity and, promote them on this
> board as fact, thus derailing threads ad finitum. Some of us
> are still waiting for your "compelling evidence" of a "high
> pressure event" in the King's Chamber. Just another on your
> list of fantasies.
>
> You first came on this board with your rubbish story lifted
> from 1001 Tales of the Arabian Nights, about the "booty" taken
> from G1 by Al Mamun. I called you out on the fact that, despite
> demanding "hard evidence" from everyone else, you had presented
> no evidence whatsoever to support your absurd notion and
> accused you then, of simply making things up and having
> absolutely no credibility.
>
> Nothing has changed. My initial call still stands.
>
> lover
>
You're doing a fine job digging your own grave at this point.
I can't help it if you can't see the evidence all around that site.
I'll get back to you when I return home.
Maybe by then you'll provide the actual evidence you claim you cited about the ostraca translation. Those publicly available documents didn't contain any translations, unless you are referring to the article we need to pay $30 to see.
Meanwhile, perhaps you'll learn to be civil and allow others their own analyses if they happen to deviate from your own.
> Hi Origyptian,
>
> You stated :
>
> "From all that I've seen from Mons Claudianus, there is
> compelling evidence that those granite artifacts were not
> quarried by the Romans but rather were originally part of the
> infrastructure of far older structures within those
> settlements..."
>
> There is no compelling evidence.
>
> Actually, there is not a shred of evidence to support such a
> stupid, nonsensical statement. Do you really think that any
> rational person would believe that the Mons Claudianus was the
> site of an unknown culture who just happened to have built a
> version of the Pantheon there (even if it was just the
> columns), and it fell down, was discovered by the Romans and
> transported back to Rome?
>
> How could any sane person possibly come up with such claptrap?
> Again, you just make things up in your own mind, somehow
> convince yourself of their veracity and, promote them on this
> board as fact, thus derailing threads ad finitum. Some of us
> are still waiting for your "compelling evidence" of a "high
> pressure event" in the King's Chamber. Just another on your
> list of fantasies.
>
> You first came on this board with your rubbish story lifted
> from 1001 Tales of the Arabian Nights, about the "booty" taken
> from G1 by Al Mamun. I called you out on the fact that, despite
> demanding "hard evidence" from everyone else, you had presented
> no evidence whatsoever to support your absurd notion and
> accused you then, of simply making things up and having
> absolutely no credibility.
>
> Nothing has changed. My initial call still stands.
>
> lover
>
You're doing a fine job digging your own grave at this point.
I can't help it if you can't see the evidence all around that site.
I'll get back to you when I return home.
Maybe by then you'll provide the actual evidence you claim you cited about the ostraca translation. Those publicly available documents didn't contain any translations, unless you are referring to the article we need to pay $30 to see.
Meanwhile, perhaps you'll learn to be civil and allow others their own analyses if they happen to deviate from your own.
______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.