> Please provide images of confirmed AE heiroglyphs/quarry marks
> that can only have been painted during the building of the
I never said the pyramids were not built by Egyptians.
I have no idea where he got that from.
I only said the evidence points to a time earlier than the dynastics.
Regarding the language, who knows where the dynastics got their hieroglyphics. It's considered by many to have the characteristics of a de novo language which, considering its complexity, should have taken longer to develop according to other language development patterns. I believe the evidence indicates the language was inherited by the dynastics.
Therefore, we allow the possibility that the original older form of glyphs were ancient even in the OK, but the OK Egyptians adapted the language and made it their own, likely providing their own meaning into each glyph which may very well have been disconnected form their original meaning.
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?