> loveritas wrote:
> > Hi Egogyptian,
> Lololo. I think a little pee just came out.
> > "...so sorry for the length of this, but you do have a
> > singular way of bringing out the best in me, so..."
> > You flatter yourself.
> > For someone who is proctologically insistent upon "hard
> > evidence" your extensive waffle about nothing, other than some
> > vague "claim" by an Egyptian pharaoh really reveals the
> > shallowness of your research and the lack of understanding
> > which you repetitively display on this board on subjects such
> > as the OP.
> > If this is your best................
> > lover
> > PS. As I've previously indicated, you're a master of the "What
> > Isn't", but when it comes to the "What Is", you flounder like a
> > stranded mullet. Anyway, not to worry. I think I can hear that
> > English bugle in the distance. Help is on the way.
> All true.
The entire reason I'm WITHHOLDING my hypothesis is its lack of enough physical evidence at this point, unlike several others here who insist on proselytizing things like tombs, stonework capabilities, and the ability to divine the intentions of the designers without having any real basis for doing so.
And you wonder why I didn't embrace your little game.
What "hard evidence" do YOU have that G1 was first on Giza?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?