Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
molder Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hello Harte
>
> Lemuria is the name of a place in the
> south pacific ocean. It's short name is Mu and it
> is both a legend and reality as you easily learn
> if you visit yourself.
I don't come here often, do I?
Sorry, no.
Mu is in no way related to Lemuria. Perhaps you could yourself look into this matter, as I already have and I don't care to duplicate any of my efforts, despite the insistence of anyone that doesn't know what they're talking about.
> Mu or Mu'a is located on Tonga Tupu the island
> which holds the capital of Tonga in Nuku alofa.
> Mu is built on an artifical island about half way
> between the capital Nuku alofa and the Ha amonga a
> Maui 'the Stonehenge of the pacific'. Mu'a has
> many 'langi' or terraced tombs and it's main
> centre is surrounded by an artificial moat.
No, Mu is a nonexistent land invented by Chuchward when he incorrectly "translated" what we today call the Madrid Codex of the Mayans.
Lemuria is a nonexistant land bridge that was hypothesized by mainstream science to explain the existence of lemur fossils in Asia. Which is why wiki states it was rendered obsolete by modern theories of plate tectonics. Plate tectonics explains those fossils very well, and, since the movement of those tectonic plates has been verified and measured thousands of times, Lemuria is now an obsolete hypothesis.
Doesn't matter what Madame Blavatski or Cayce said about it - it never existed.
I hate it when fringies don't even know their own fables.
Harte
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hello Harte
>
> Lemuria is the name of a place in the
> south pacific ocean. It's short name is Mu and it
> is both a legend and reality as you easily learn
> if you visit yourself.
I don't come here often, do I?
Sorry, no.
Mu is in no way related to Lemuria. Perhaps you could yourself look into this matter, as I already have and I don't care to duplicate any of my efforts, despite the insistence of anyone that doesn't know what they're talking about.
> Mu or Mu'a is located on Tonga Tupu the island
> which holds the capital of Tonga in Nuku alofa.
> Mu is built on an artifical island about half way
> between the capital Nuku alofa and the Ha amonga a
> Maui 'the Stonehenge of the pacific'. Mu'a has
> many 'langi' or terraced tombs and it's main
> centre is surrounded by an artificial moat.
No, Mu is a nonexistent land invented by Chuchward when he incorrectly "translated" what we today call the Madrid Codex of the Mayans.
Lemuria is a nonexistant land bridge that was hypothesized by mainstream science to explain the existence of lemur fossils in Asia. Which is why wiki states it was rendered obsolete by modern theories of plate tectonics. Plate tectonics explains those fossils very well, and, since the movement of those tectonic plates has been verified and measured thousands of times, Lemuria is now an obsolete hypothesis.
Doesn't matter what Madame Blavatski or Cayce said about it - it never existed.
I hate it when fringies don't even know their own fables.
Harte
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.