Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
DScribr wrote:
>
>
> ANOTHER lame attempt to twist my words.
>
>
> Yet again: Vyse assumed, hence his belief, he still could be
> right, but I doubt it.
>
> Later Archaeology doesn't know that for sure, and no one knows
> the age of the iron pc. either. The point is moot, why are you
> making such a big deal about it?
Just trying to establish your position..
You Said.
"Yet again: Vyse assumed, hence is belief, He still could be right, but I doubt it".
So you doubt that Vyse was right. Based upon his incorrect assumption and hence belief.
Thanks, that pretty well clears it all up.
>
>
> ANOTHER lame attempt to twist my words.
>
>
> Yet again: Vyse assumed, hence his belief, he still could be
> right, but I doubt it.
>
> Later Archaeology doesn't know that for sure, and no one knows
> the age of the iron pc. either. The point is moot, why are you
> making such a big deal about it?
Just trying to establish your position..
You Said.
"Yet again: Vyse assumed, hence is belief, He still could be right, but I doubt it".
So you doubt that Vyse was right. Based upon his incorrect assumption and hence belief.
Thanks, that pretty well clears it all up.
x
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.