DScribr wrote:



>
>
> ANOTHER lame attempt to twist my words.
>
>
> Yet again: Vyse assumed, hence his belief, he still could be
> right, but I doubt it.
>
> Later Archaeology doesn't know that for sure, and no one knows
> the age of the iron pc. either. The point is moot, why are you
> making such a big deal about it?


Just trying to establish your position..

You Said.
"Yet again: Vyse assumed, hence is belief, He still could be right, but I doubt it".

So you doubt that Vyse was right. Based upon his incorrect assumption and hence belief.

Thanks, that pretty well clears it all up.