> You only care that you can now speculate that the same iron pc.
> was made by the 'VAE'
> My statements correctly point out your 'intellectual
> dishonesty', etc.
> There is zero evidence that G1 was built by the 'VAE' in the
> 3rd millennium BC, or any other millennium, because there is
> zero evidence the 'VAE' existed, etc.
> There's mass quantities of evidence that proves the AE
> existed, etc.
Over the past few months, you and others here who subscribe to the orthodox ideology have been given ample opportunity to prove your claims and you have failed to do so by any modern standards for burden of proof. You keep on rattling off the same old "Strabo said...", or "Herodotus said..." or "Reisner said..." quotes hoping that it's enough to continue to carry credibility among the gullible, but you are losing your audience because modern thinkers know better than to fall for such obsolete standards of authenticity.
What you fail to see is that much of the "evidence" you attribute to the AE isn't evidence of AE at all. Bore holes into granite? Impossible. Paper thin seams between 80 ton slabs of granite? Impossible.
On the flip side is all kinds of "evidence" attributed to the AE, that doesn't even exist: mummies in pyramids, bow-drills, copper cylinders. It's all fabricated with ZERO evidence.
It was once fun to debate with you about these things. But frankly it's gotten boring, because the growing evidence that continues to catastrophically contradict the AE narrative shows pretty clearly that what you're calling "AE evidence" is a product of either grossly misguided attribution, or pure fabrication. This is what the historic record is starting to show very clearly.