Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Jon Ellison wrote:
> DScribr wrote:
>
> > Jon Ellison wrote:
> >
> > > Yes you're right.
> > > Vyse "must have been mistaken.
> > > He must have been
> > > He must have been
> > > He must have been mistaken............
> > > I mean after all anyone can make a mistake. It stands to
> > > reason. One of the greatest finds in Egypt's history. Get
> all
> > > excited and make a three paragraph mistake. Slip of the
> pen.
> > > Perfectly understandable..
> > > Yes you're right Dscriber. A simple mistake
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > Post Edited (05-Apr-15 00:57)
> >
> >
> > Do you believe that repeating a phrase over and over will
> make
> > it true.?
> >
> >
> > Like us, Vyse and Co. had no way of knowing the age of the
> iron
> > pc. (But this doesn't stop some from previously speculating,
> > [incorrectly] a few months ago that Vyse planted the pc.
> there,
> > and now are wildly speculating that this pc. was made by the
> > 'VAE' some 1,000's of yrs. prior to the 4th D.)
> >
> >
> >
> > Their assuming it was a 4th D. made pc. was a mistake.
>
> That's gibberish..
> Vyse stated in his journal that the iron plate could only be
> contemporary with the structure.. I'm sure you believe that. I
> mean if it was a mistake consisting of about 100 words in a
> published journal it would hardly constitute a slip of the pen
> would it. And if it is a "Mistake" how many other "mistakes"
> did he make?
> Are you bringing into question the integrity of Vyse's journal?
> Implying that he could have made such a gargantuan "mistake"
>
> Therefore we must assume that if the GP was built during the
> 4th dynasty then the builders had iron. I'm sure you can get
> your head around that.
>
> Unfortunately... The archaeological record & Egyptology clearly
> say that the 4th AE did not have iron..
>
>
> >
>
It's plain English actually.
As stated, "Their assuming it was a 4th D. made pc. was a mistake." They believed it to be authentic, and wrote it up, (and acted) accordingly, (see catchpenny.org for the controversy regarding its authenticity that followed, and continues.) It's an old argument, and we still can't date the pc. so it's all speculations.
This possibility still exists: "The iron pc. could've been dropped by a 16th Century worker removing casing stones.")
The AE certainly could've built the Pyramids without iron in the 4th Dynasty, regardless of your attempts to spin it otherwise here.
'We' are welcome to assume whatever, and ignore whatever parts you care to, (see above)....I'll stick to the facts, thanks anyway.
(We already had this circular 'discussion' some months ago....you may recall there were those who claimed loudly that Vyse planted that pc.
> DScribr wrote:
>
> > Jon Ellison wrote:
> >
> > > Yes you're right.
> > > Vyse "must have been mistaken.
> > > He must have been
> > > He must have been
> > > He must have been mistaken............
> > > I mean after all anyone can make a mistake. It stands to
> > > reason. One of the greatest finds in Egypt's history. Get
> all
> > > excited and make a three paragraph mistake. Slip of the
> pen.
> > > Perfectly understandable..
> > > Yes you're right Dscriber. A simple mistake
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > Post Edited (05-Apr-15 00:57)
> >
> >
> > Do you believe that repeating a phrase over and over will
> make
> > it true.?
> >
> >
> > Like us, Vyse and Co. had no way of knowing the age of the
> iron
> > pc. (But this doesn't stop some from previously speculating,
> > [incorrectly] a few months ago that Vyse planted the pc.
> there,
> > and now are wildly speculating that this pc. was made by the
> > 'VAE' some 1,000's of yrs. prior to the 4th D.)
> >
> >
> >
> > Their assuming it was a 4th D. made pc. was a mistake.
>
> That's gibberish..
> Vyse stated in his journal that the iron plate could only be
> contemporary with the structure.. I'm sure you believe that. I
> mean if it was a mistake consisting of about 100 words in a
> published journal it would hardly constitute a slip of the pen
> would it. And if it is a "Mistake" how many other "mistakes"
> did he make?
> Are you bringing into question the integrity of Vyse's journal?
> Implying that he could have made such a gargantuan "mistake"
>
> Therefore we must assume that if the GP was built during the
> 4th dynasty then the builders had iron. I'm sure you can get
> your head around that.
>
> Unfortunately... The archaeological record & Egyptology clearly
> say that the 4th AE did not have iron..
>
>
> >
>
It's plain English actually.
As stated, "Their assuming it was a 4th D. made pc. was a mistake." They believed it to be authentic, and wrote it up, (and acted) accordingly, (see catchpenny.org for the controversy regarding its authenticity that followed, and continues.) It's an old argument, and we still can't date the pc. so it's all speculations.
This possibility still exists: "The iron pc. could've been dropped by a 16th Century worker removing casing stones.")
The AE certainly could've built the Pyramids without iron in the 4th Dynasty, regardless of your attempts to spin it otherwise here.
'We' are welcome to assume whatever, and ignore whatever parts you care to, (see above)....I'll stick to the facts, thanks anyway.
(We already had this circular 'discussion' some months ago....you may recall there were those who claimed loudly that Vyse planted that pc.
Currently accepted Pyramide dates stand until proven otherwise.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.