Origyptian wrote:

> DScribr wrote:
>
> > Yes, there are scratches shown on the Glyphs in the 2008
> > Documentary, BUT this doesn't change the fact that the 2
> > Germans illegally took paint samples from these Glyphs. I'm
> > talking about the Dr. Hawass who WAS NOT even working for the
> > SCA @ the time of this incident.
>
> He was most definitely working there between 2006 and 2008 when
> the cartouche scratches occurred.
>
>
> > What better way to promote Tourism to your country, and sell
> > your clothes....I see nothing wrong with it.
>
> Well, the SCA apparently did since they reprimanded him for it
> and arrested the photographer.
>
>
> > So, plz tell me how this act compares to SC's baseless
> > defamation of Col. Vyse's character w/ the purpose of selling
> > his new book.
>
> Why are you baiting me to comment on something Scott said? Ask
> him, not me. But as far as I know, what Zahi did was against
> the law. And Scott doesn't have a government position
> chartering him with protecting, or being chief cheerleader for,
> any national treasures. Scott is free to voice any opinion he
> wants to, Zahi was not. So I don't understand your complaint.

More scratches occurred when the 2 Germans scraped off some paint samples.

NOT baiting, asking your opinion....but, I guess you can't understand normal thinking.

SC is free to voice his opinion, but he isn't free to wrongly slander a deceased man w/ the purpose of selling books.