Origyptian wrote:

> DScribr wrote:
>
> > > Both you and Martin Stower have accused me of defaming
> certain
> > > respectable "named individuals". I've challenged Stower to
> > > produce the evidence of defamation and also of "forgery"
> but he
> > > has not yet done so. I now challenge you to do the same.
> > >
> > > Also, please cite an example of "ALL evidence that
> contradicts"
> > > my proposal (note: authors' "claims" are not valid examples
> > > unless such claims are backed by physical evidence).
> >
> >
> > YOU are the one claiming that the Stele Cartouche is not
> > authentic and it's not attributed to the 4th Dynasty. It's up
> > to YOU to provide the evidence to support YOUR claims.
> >
> > ANY valid evidence that's presented to you that contradicts
> > your position is imm. dismissed by you due to the most
> trivial
> > reasons....so, why should we bother presenting any?
> >
> > P.S. Remember when you told me, "I have no interest in
> proving
> > anything to you"??? (I do.)



Ori's reply: "I will leave it up to the reader to determine the soundness of
> your logic. Your tagline says it all, in my opinion."


MY logic isn't in question here, YOURS IS. BTW, a lame attempt on your part to try and weasel out of your responsibilities here.



YOU made several claims based ONLY on your speculations here, and NOW it's up to YOU to back up the claims you've made....and then we'll let the reader decide.



It's not up to me to provide links to your previous posts....IF YOU can't remember what you've said, that's YOUR problem.